Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 14, 2:14*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:33:58 -0800 (PST), phaedrus wrote: why are transmitters normalised to 50 ohms when clearly 450 ohms would enable us to enjoy cheaper, do-it- yourself, lower loss feeders? A 450 ohm coaxial cable would be rather large. * Zo = 450 = 138 log(b/a) * (where b=OD and a=ID) For an inner conductor diameter of 1 mm, the outer shield diameter would need to be 1800 mm or about 71 inches. -- Jeff Liebermann * * 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558 I understand the Navy used to have some coaxial line you could drive through. The center conducter was hung from huge ceramic insulators similar to those used by the power company. Jimmie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
75 Ohms - It's Not Just For TV Anymore | Shortwave | |||
antenna impedance - calculated 10 - 20 Ohms - measured 36 Ohms?? | Antenna | |||
73 Ohms, How do you get it? | Antenna | |||
DDS 50 ohms buffer ? | Homebrew | |||
DDS 50 ohms buffer ? | Homebrew |