Amateur radio on Linux
 

Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958

Amateur radio on Linux
 

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:51, Tonyfrost wrote in rec.radio.amateur.antenna
:

Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958

That article is dated "February 06, 2007 (8:00:00 AM)" so it's not
exactly breaking news.

Fldigi is currently at version 3.12.5, available via
http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html

So, what exactly is "amuzing" [sic]?

--
Nigel Rowe
A pox upon the spammers that make me write my address like..
rho (snail) fisheggs (stop) name

Amateur radio on Linux
 

"Tonyfrost" wrote in message
...
Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958

1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham" is a
derrogatory term.
2) Nothing in that article is anything new, as compared to the 1990's, as
far as digital operation goes.

Amateur radio on Linux
 

D. Stussy wrote:
"Tonyfrost" wrote in message
...
Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958

1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham" is a
derrogatory term.
2) Nothing in that article is anything new, as compared to the 1990's, as
far as digital operation goes.



Ham is a "derrogatory" term?

You can't spell, or run a spell check. And apparently you haven't a
clue which would indicate you aren't a ham either.

tom
K0TAR

Amateur radio on Linux
 

1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham" is a
derrogatory term.

Ham is a "derrogatory" term?

You can't spell, or run a spell check. And apparently you haven't a
clue which would indicate you aren't a ham either.

Well, to give D. Stussy some credit, it's true that "ham" did start
out as a derogatory term. It was used by some commercial (ship?)
radio operators, back in the Olde Days, to refer to some early
high-ego amateur operators who were cluttering up the airwaves with
their spark-gap transmissions (long since outlawed).

The term has long since been absorbed by most of the amateur radio
community as a self-deprecating term of identity and pride. It's
certainly possible that some of the licensed amateur operators I know
would take offense at being referred to as "a ham", but I can't recall
ever hearing anyone object to it. I certainly don't mind. In fact I
think it's a good thing when somebody looks at my car's license plate
and says "Oh, you must be a ham!" - it says that a member of the
public is at least aware of us. If the term isn't meant in an
offensive way, why take offense at it?

I think the modern linguistic equivalent to the original derogatory
meaning of the term would be "a lid"... and this is *not* something I
would ever hope to be called with justice!

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Amateur radio on Linux
 

"tom" wrote in message
. net...
D. Stussy wrote:
"Tonyfrost" wrote in message

...
Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958

1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham" is
a
derrogatory term.
2) Nothing in that article is anything new, as compared to the 1990's,
as
far as digital operation goes.



Ham is a "derrogatory" term?

You can't spell, or run a spell check. And apparently you haven't a
clue which would indicate you aren't a ham either.

There's no requirement to run a "speling-chek" on any Usenet article.

Ham: Correct - I'm NOT a "ham." I'm a licensed amateur radio operator.


In addition to the historical meaning recognized by another response,
there's another relevent meaning: Have you noticed that many operators are
not only overweight but actually obese. Maybe they are "hams" - they
certainly are pigs! Their fat proves such.

Amateur radio on Linux
 

,
tom writes:

Ham is a "derrogatory" term?

Tony Hancock - The Radio Ham:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mEiM0DyVBI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWuXsDj_ppI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IcN2_a_GgA&feature=related

Amateur radio on Linux
 

D. Stussy wrote:
"tom" wrote in message
. net...
D. Stussy wrote:
"Tonyfrost" wrote in message

...
Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958
1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham" is
a
derrogatory term.
2) Nothing in that article is anything new, as compared to the 1990's,
as
far as digital operation goes.


Ham is a "derrogatory" term?

You can't spell, or run a spell check. And apparently you haven't a
clue which would indicate you aren't a ham either.

There's no requirement to run a "speling-chek" on any Usenet article.

Ham: Correct - I'm NOT a "ham." I'm a licensed amateur radio operator.


In addition to the historical meaning recognized by another response,
there's another relevent meaning: Have you noticed that many operators are
not only overweight but actually obese. Maybe they are "hams" - they
certainly are pigs! Their fat proves such.

Here we go again. I'd rather be super fat than be an ignnorant fellow
that thinks that weight is a metric of worth.

And seriously, if you have such a problem with being called a Ham, there
are classes and counseling available to improve your "self worth" image.

Then you might not be so touchy or feel the need to denigrate the obese.

- Mike N3LI -

Amateur radio on Linux
 

In "D. Stussy"
wrote:

1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham"
is a derrogatory term.

Derrogatory [sic]?

Oh! That explains why "Ham Radio Magazine" had to stop publishing after
only 22 years.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

Amateur radio on Linux
 

"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...
D. Stussy wrote:
"tom" wrote in message
. net...
D. Stussy wrote:
"Tonyfrost" wrote in message


...
Fldigi 1.2 is a popular new program for Linux and FreeBSD which
enables amateur radio operators to join their radios and their
computers at the hip and create a new kind of ham shack: a digital
ham
shack. Quite amuzing:
Article: http://www.linux.com/archive/articles/59958
1) Written by yet another asshole who doesn't understand that "ham"
is
a
derrogatory term.
2) Nothing in that article is anything new, as compared to the
1990's,
as
far as digital operation goes.


Ham is a "derrogatory" term?

You can't spell, or run a spell check. And apparently you haven't a
clue which would indicate you aren't a ham either.

There's no requirement to run a "speling-chek" on any Usenet article.

Ham: Correct - I'm NOT a "ham." I'm a licensed amateur radio
operator.


In addition to the historical meaning recognized by another response,
there's another relevent meaning: Have you noticed that many operators
are
not only overweight but actually obese. Maybe they are "hams" - they
certainly are pigs! Their fat proves such.

Here we go again. I'd rather be super fat than be an ignnorant fellow
that thinks that weight is a metric of worth.

And seriously, if you have such a problem with being called a Ham, there
are classes and counseling available to improve your "self worth" image.

No one calls me a ham. They know better. They are not ignorant.

Then you might not be so touchy or feel the need to denigrate the obese.

You haven't seen my local licenseholder population. When one exceeds 300
pounds, what would you call them? Thin?