Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:26:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne
wrote: Richard Please share the rest of the story. If we lay out multi length radials for the middle of each band, say four of them, and feed the vertical with the auto tuner would we be able to make it work on eighty, and forty? When we use a half wave end fed zep in the form of a J pole on two meters we don't need a counterpoise. If I extend this mast to a half wave on forty will I still need a counterpoise? Hi Tom, Thanx for something more specific that we can get our teeth into. If you lay out radials that are tuned, such as you suggest, then you wouldn't need an autotuner. There is, of course, the state of tune in the radiator that needs to be accounted for, and I suppose the autotuner would be put to work in that regard. If so, then you are putting too much effort into the tune of the radials. On the third hand, it doesn't hurt in the overall effort. If you are going to have an autotuner (is this at the base of the radiator, or back in the shack?); then there is a simpler and probably more efficient use of the radial wire. Over the years, the topic of how many and how long of radials with a horizontal has had so many variables that the discussion ran to examining the trivial instead of being useful. The useful advice is to lay down as many radials as you can, but with a couple to three dozen being a comfortable upper limit instead of the classic 120. Their length should be equal to the radiator's height. This doesn't make for a "tuned" vertical (except, perhaps, on some frequency that probably is not in a Ham band if the height of the antenna is ad-hoc); but it will be as efficient as is practicable. You will still have to tune it. You will still suffer transmission line loss related to the SWR exhibited at the feedpoint. It can be unmanageable if its dimension approaches half-wave. Some of these negatives can be managed by tuning the feedpoint with matching and this is why I asked where the autotuner was located. You anticipate the half-wave in your last question. The classical answer there is no, you won't need a standard ground treatment. But if you don't have some thing there, then tuning may become a chore because the radiator, whatever its length, is always HALF of the system. The radials typically are thought of as the other half. If you don't have any, your transmission line will take up that function in one way or another, and often to your annoyance. As for the JPole discussion. Many who crow about their being simple tunes and there being no problems with matching, some are simply experiencing the transmission line being brought both into the tune and the radiation. The second part of that equation lengthens the overall radiator and sends the signal skyward. Yes, it tuned up fine, but you then have a deaf antenna - suitable for the local repeater, but so is an elevated rubber ducky. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Where does high gain antenna get the gain from? | Antenna | |||
Wire Antenna Element s : Five Foot (5') Long -=V=- Fifty Foot (50') Long | Shortwave | |||
FREE Birdview Dish's 9 foot and 10 foot | Boatanchors | |||
Hy-Gain Hy-Tower 2" Mast Needed | Antenna |