| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
May 11th 10, 09:41 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
What ever program you use let me know the result for a fat dipole.
Walk the walk ! Forget the talk! Are you sure you have not violated the segment length/wire diameter ratio? From Cebik; Intermediate Antenna Modeling: "In NEC-2 it is especially important to keep the segment length (greater than) about 4 times the wire diameter. You may reduce this value by half by invoking the EK command." Also, what does your "Average Gain Test" report show? 73, Frank |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment | |||
![Frank[_12_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
