![]() |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On 7/8/2010 2:44 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
wrote ... On 7 jul, 16:55, "Szczepan wrote: This principle is used today to produce the light in the free electron laser: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FEL_principle.png Yes, very interesting example (and device), Respect to DC current EM radiation, In that time Richard bring an interesting example of 20 kV electron rectilinear beam rendering a frequency of 34.6 EHz, the calculus it was quite right, but that frequency it is not EM waves radiated by electrons but a "matter wave' frequency... (idem with car analogy = not charged and acelerated cars :) do not radiates EM waves, but may have a matter wave asociated to them). Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. For these reasons IMHO I think -as Cecil do-: basic (undergraduated?) physics books are very useful to helping us to better understand and enjoy our ham topics. For graduated is the field math only. S* 73 - Miguel You guys are better than Monty Python. tom K0TAR |
what happens to reflected energy ?
"lu6etj" wrote ... On 8 jul, 04:44, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. For these reasons IMHO I think -as Cecil do-: basic (undergraduated?) physics books are very useful to helping us to better understand and enjoy our ham topics. For graduated is the field math only. Hello Szczepan, good day: I do not know if I undestood quit right your sentences (we are both out of our native lenaguage) correct me if I am wrong. Such as we have more troubles with writting than with understanding. Today we do not conceive unverse as a material thing, then if you want to say with "each waves are material waves" that all is mater you are talking with century XIX words/concepts. Some things were discovered before XIX century. Many more after. However matter waves are not neither mater nor energy waves, they are "probabilty waves", probability it is not a "thing", it is a mathematical concept, surely you know that. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". S* .. |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 9, 6:16*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"lu6etj" ... On 8 jul, 04:44, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. For these reasons IMHO I think -as Cecil do-: basic (undergraduated?) physics books are very useful to helping us to better understand and enjoy our ham topics. For graduated is the field math only. Hello Szczepan, good day: I do not know if I undestood quit right your sentences (we are both out of our native lenaguage) correct me if I am wrong. Such as we have more troubles with writting than with understanding. Today we do not conceive unverse as a material thing, then if you want to say with "each waves are material waves" that all is mater you are talking with century XIX words/concepts. Some things were discovered before XIX century. Many more after. However matter waves are not neither mater nor energy waves, they are "probabilty waves", probability it is not a "thing", it is a mathematical concept, surely you know that. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". S* . don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century. some day he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the 20th century. |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On 9 jul, 09:16, K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:16*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: *"lu6etj" ... On 8 jul, 04:44, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. For these reasons IMHO I think -as Cecil do-: basic (undergraduated?) physics books are very useful to helping us to better understand and enjoy our ham topics. For graduated is the field math only. Hello Szczepan, good day: I do not know if I undestood quit right your sentences (we are both out of our native lenaguage) correct me if I am wrong. Such as we have more troubles with writting than with understanding. Today we do not conceive unverse as a material thing, then if you want to say with "each waves are material waves" that all is mater you are talking with century XIX words/concepts. Some things were discovered before XIX century. Many more after. However matter waves are not neither mater nor energy waves, they are "probabilty waves", probability it is not a "thing", it is a mathematical concept, surely you know that. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". S* . don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century. *some day he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the 20th century.- Ocultar texto de la cita - - Mostrar texto de la cita - |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On 9 jul, 09:16, K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:16*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: *"lu6etj" ... On 8 jul, 04:44, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. For these reasons IMHO I think -as Cecil do-: basic (undergraduated?) physics books are very useful to helping us to better understand and enjoy our ham topics. For graduated is the field math only. Hello Szczepan, good day: I do not know if I undestood quit right your sentences (we are both out of our native lenaguage) correct me if I am wrong. Such as we have more troubles with writting than with understanding. Today we do not conceive unverse as a material thing, then if you want to say with "each waves are material waves" that all is mater you are talking with century XIX words/concepts. Some things were discovered before XIX century. Many more after. However matter waves are not neither mater nor energy waves, they are "probabilty waves", probability it is not a "thing", it is a mathematical concept, surely you know that. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". S* . don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century. *some day he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the 20th century.- Ocultar texto de la cita - - Mostrar texto de la cita - Well, then I will have to dust my book about caloric and phlogyston... :) Miguel |
what happens to reflected energy ?
"K1TTT" wrote ... On Jul 9, 6:16 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century. I am in plasma physics. It is in XXI century. It is nothing wrong that I know that Ludwig Lorenz discovered space plasma in XIX century. some day he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the 20th century. They were debunked in XIX century. I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices and aether". Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them" S* |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 9, 1:42*pm, lu6etj wrote:
On 9 jul, 09:16, K1TTT wrote: On Jul 9, 6:16*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: *"lu6etj" ... On 8 jul, 04:44, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. For these reasons IMHO I think -as Cecil do-: basic (undergraduated?) physics books are very useful to helping us to better understand and enjoy our ham topics. For graduated is the field math only. Hello Szczepan, good day: I do not know if I undestood quit right your sentences (we are both out of our native lenaguage) correct me if I am wrong. Such as we have more troubles with writting than with understanding. Today we do not conceive unverse as a material thing, then if you want to say with "each waves are material waves" that all is mater you are talking with century XIX words/concepts. Some things were discovered before XIX century. Many more after. However matter waves are not neither mater nor energy waves, they are "probabilty waves", probability it is not a "thing", it is a mathematical concept, surely you know that. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". S* . don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century. *some day he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the 20th century.- Ocultar texto de la cita - - Mostrar texto de la cita - Well, then I will have to dust my book about caloric and phlogyston... :) Miguel to talk with mr.b those may be useful! |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 9, 4:25*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ... On Jul 9, 6:16 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass dependent. So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are ions), and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the extremally high speed. The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by experiments. All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not know that in the space is matter. Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is. "surely you know that" also. If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves and "probabilty waves". don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century. I am in plasma physics. It is in XXI century. It is nothing wrong that I know that Ludwig Lorenz discovered space plasma in XIX century. some day he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the 20th century. They were debunked in XIX century. I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices and aether". Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them" S* well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's equations instead. |
what happens to reflected energy ?
"K1TTT" wrote ... On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: They were debunked in XIX century. I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices and aether". Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them" well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's equations instead. They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM. I prefer real physics. S* |
what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ... On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: They were debunked in XIX century. I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices and aether". Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them" well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's equations instead. They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM. I prefer real physics. S* assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just fine. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com