Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Richard,
You asked for what it IS, several times, so you virtually left me no choice. Especially the first one (Zout = 9 ohms where the load is 16 Ohms, RCout = -0.28) is very well documented as it was designed to have this value. Without the extra measures, the value was below 9 Ohms. The amplifier is time limited fully short circuit proof, so it was not difficult to determine Zout at various loads. I put myself into problems when publishing the documentation over here. When we go back to my first posting in this thread (the first reply) where I stated that amplifiers do not show 50 Ohms in general, is not that strange and doesn't violate Walt's conclusions. When I understand it well, Walt assumes tuning for maximum output at a given drive (not necessarily the maximum drive). As mentioned earlier, I support his findings. When you don't touch the plate and load capacitor and change from 50 Ohms to a load with VSWR = 2, you violate Walt's conditions and the amplifier will no long behave as a 50 Ohms source, hence what happens with the 50W reflected power from JC's posting becomes more complicated then just a transmission line problem. Walt made a statement in this thread that an amplifier that obeys ZL = Zout can have higher then 50% efficiency. I fully support this statement also (Example Class C amplifier with narrow conduction angle at the edge of current/voltage saturation, with efficiency over 75%). However, change the load and you get a complete other situation. You have to retune to get back to Walt's condition. From my experience, many devices with conventional amplifiers (like the valve with pi-filter, or single transistor stages) are now being replaced by other topologies where ZL Zout under specified load (as these types of amplifiers are not optimized for maximum gain, but for maximum power added efficiency). I think Tom, KT7ITM also have this experience. The example given by JC (huge reflection) and my own experience with conventional and high efficiency topologies resulted in my statement that a PA is not a 50 Ohms source. Maybe I had to be more precise to mention the exceptions: forward power control loop as mentioned by Roy, -tuning to maximum output after each change of load, -specially designed negative feedback, -adding an attenuator. The reader can now determine the category for his PA. In case of doubt use the forward power measurement technique, when it changes under varying load, your amplifier doesn’t behave as a 50 Ohms source. Best Regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? | Antenna |