Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 6:36*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Owen Duffy wrote: lu6etj wrote in news:da3e5147-cad8-47f9-9784- : ... OK. Thank you very much. This clarify so much the issue to me. Please, another question: On the same system-example, who does not agree with the notion that the reflected power is never dissipated in Thevenin Rs? (I am referring to habitual posters in these threads, of course) Thevenin's theorem says nothing of what happens inside the source (eg dissipation), or how the source may be implemented. . . . Cecil has used this fact as a convenient way of avoiding confrontation with the illustrations given in my "food for thought" essays. However, those models aren't claimed to be Thevenin equivalents of anything. They are just simple models consisting of an ideal source and a perfect resistance, as used in may circuit analysis textbooks to illustrate basic electrical circuit operation. The dissipation in the resistance is clearly not related to "reflected power", and the reflected power "theories" being promoted here fail to explain the relationship between the dissipation in the resistor and "reflected power". I contend that if an analytical method fails to correctly predict the dissipation in such a simple case, it can't be trusted to predict the dissipation in other cases, and has underlying logical flaws. For all the fluff about photons, optics, non-dissipative sources, and the like, I have yet to see an equation that relates the dissipation in the resistance in one of those painfully simple circuits to the "reflected power" in the transmission line it's connected to. Roy Lewallen, W7EL obviously its not the 'reflected power'... that can be easily disproved by showing that the length of the line changes the impedance seen at the source terminals without changing the power that was reflected from the load. since it is the impedance at the source terminals that determines the performance of the amp the power that is reflected is irrelevant. however, it should be relatively easy to derive such a relation for a simple thevenin source with a lossless line and a given load impedance... just transform the impedance along the length of the line back to the source then calculate the resulting current or voltage from the source. that would give you the power dissipated in the source. then you could also calculate the reflection coefficient and separate the forward and reflected waves... and if you did it all correctly and kept everything in terms of RL, Z0, and the length of the line you could come up with a family of parametric curves relating the power dissipated in the source resistance to the reflected power over a range of load impedances for a given line length, or for varying line length for a given load. obviously a purely academic exercise that should be left for a rainy day. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mismatched Zo Connectors | Antenna | |||
Calculating loss on a mismatched line | Antenna | |||
Collins R390 power cord and power line filter | Boatanchors | |||
Collins R390 power cord and power line filter | Boatanchors | |||
Astron RS-20A Power Supply Great Condition - used to power a VHF radio | Swap |