LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old August 26th 10, 07:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 19
Default Direct connect 6 meter beam

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:38:22 +0300, KBa wrote:

On 16.06.2010 20:24, R.Scott wrote:
I see all kinds of crazy matching sections in posts about 6 meter
beams. How about direct connect.


Direct connect is used in a number of tribanders, but AFAIK it's not
used in larger than 3L beams due to the low impedance. It can also
distort the pattern, but with a 3L I doubt you'd notice. Just put 3
or 4 2.4", #32 mix toroids with 4 or 5 turns of feed line through
them. It'll give the isolation and balance needed as long as the
impedance at the feed point is correct.

I have an A4S that has major issues
in the traps and I cant find the problem (IE I opened them and cant


Problems in traps can be difficult to find. I had an ATB34 that
appeared to have a trap problem but it turned out to be the feed line
to driven element connection. They use 1/4-20 SS bolts through the
insulators. The bolts simply press on the element inside the
insulator. One was making a poor connection even though it felt
tight. Taking it apart and cleaning the ends of the bolts and
polishing the ends of the driven element where the bolts rested fixed
it even though I could see nothing wrong at the time.

find anything) SOOO I have a new A4S coming.

Has anyone taken an old 3 elem tribander and converted it to 6 meter
monobander using the direct connect.

Any Issues.


Spacing is generally far more than a little too wide.


Would a 4 elem be better since its a long boom ?


Long boom? Tribanders come in a wide variety of lengths. If it's the
typical 19 or 20', you are probably looking at around 5 elements.

Use one of the modeling programs, or get some to run it for you.


I'm pretty sure I know the answers. Just want to confirm and see if
there is any reason not to direct connect rather than through a
hairpin or a gamma match.


There's really nothing particularly complicated about a hairpin or
gamma match. There are probably lots of designs that could be copied.



Scotty W7PSK


Hi

Probably my comments are bit late... but OWA yagi's use direct feed to
driven element with a ferrite balun near the feedpoint.
OWA's give good impedance match in large bandwidth, this is based on
nearer driven element-first director spacing.
Otherwise gain, F/B etc. are very good.
I have constructed one 6m OWA yagi, with 20 ft boom as it was available,
using 7 elements in it, and finally with good match below


That's enough elements for a 30 foot boom.

S 1.2 between 50...51 MHz.
Nothing critical in it, element dimensions were taken from NW3Z & WA3FET
article in OWA yagis, their 21MHz desing was re-scaled to 50MHz.
At least waterproofing is less critical in direct feed.


Water proofing the coax is very important, particularly when you get
to 50 MHz.

73

Roger (K8RI)


73's Kari

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 2-Meter Beam Chris[_4_] Swap 0 May 28th 07 06:05 PM
automatic (direct reading) SWR Meter MAc Homebrew 14 November 12th 06 01:48 PM
F.S. New 10 meter beam Wa4uso CB 0 June 9th 04 03:14 AM
F.S. New 10 meter beam Wa4uso Antenna 0 June 9th 04 03:11 AM
FS: 11 Meter Beam (10 Meter Trimmed?) Larry General 0 May 10th 04 09:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017