RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Antenna Question Re HF Handhelds (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/152254-antenna-question-re-hf-handhelds.html)

Bob[_27_] July 3rd 10 07:52 PM

Antenna Question Re HF Handhelds
 
Hi,

I tried a shortwave radio group first, but no answers.
Should have posted here, first.

Enjoy sw listening, but frankly not all that sharp re antennas.

Over the past few months, I have seen several ads for those handheld sw
receivers and transceivers. From different mfgs.
About the size of the typical hand-held scanner receiver.

They all seem to cover up to at least 30 MHz, and most beyond.

Got to thinking about this a bit.
What do they use for an antenna for 30 MHz and below ?

I have a long end fed antenna for my listening.
Obviously they have a short "something" antenna.

How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ?

How can it work down there at all ?

I can visualize s tuned ferrite loop, such as the very old fashioned AM
table radios used to have, but wouldn't this only be effective over a
very small range ?

Or, do they expect you to hook up something "decent" to it, even though
it is supposed to be portable, and is very small ?

Any technical explanation on this would be most appreciated.

Thanks,
Bob

Richard Clark July 3rd 10 09:23 PM

Antenna Question Re HF Handhelds
 
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:52:15 -0400, Bob wrote:

I have a long end fed antenna for my listening.
Obviously they have a short "something" antenna.

How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ?

How can it work down there at all ?

I can visualize s tuned ferrite loop, such as the very old fashioned AM
table radios used to have, but wouldn't this only be effective over a
very small range ?


Hi Bob,

A make and model number would get you a more definitive answer.
However, for the broader question, and as you undoubtedly expect, more
antenna is better - to a point. Some will argue, theoretically,
otherwise. I go with results.

When I was in South Africa (no, not the World Cup), I took along one
of Radio Shack's cheapest SW radios. It had the conventional whip,
and it offered the conventional whimp. However, having foresight, I
also took along about 20 feet of wirewrap wire with a quarter taped
onto one end. At the close of day, I would wrap one end around the
shortened whip and I would toss the quarter into the rafters (we
stayed in thatched covered huts), all of a ten or fourteen foot
height; and signals came booming in from all over the continent and
Europe.

Another thing missing from these small jobs are a tuned front end. In
fact, you can spend a lot of money on SW radios and still not get
front end tuning. A preselector, or simple antenna tuner (as cheap as
one as you can find, or build one for $10) will go far, far, far.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Fred McKenzie July 4th 10 03:55 AM

Antenna Question Re HF Handhelds
 
In article ,
Bob wrote:

How effective is a short "something" around 5 to 10 MHz, e.g. ?

How can it work down there at all ?


Bob-

Like Richard, I have one of the small Radio Shack SW Receivers. I think
it was made for them by Sangean. It has a telescoping antenna that may
be as long as 36 inches when extended. No, a 36 inch antenna is not as
good as a longer wire for Shortwave reception.

Someone with a better understanding of antenna theory may be able to
calculate just how much worse it is, but suppose it receives a signal at
a 20 dB lower level (1/100th the power level or 1/10th the voltage) than
a full-size antenna. All you need is a stronger signal to make up for
it. But when propagation is good, signals can be quite strong.

Even so, it wouldn't hurt to take along some extra antenna wire!

Fred


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com