| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 19 jul, 20:58, Gsat wrote:
On the yard around my house I have two possible spots where to erect a multiband vertical, an HF6V. On the first spot it is possible to lay down a symmetrical net of radials as long as the antenna is tall, but the antenna will be close to buildings on tree sides, at a distance about two to four times the antenna height. Buildings in Italy are built by rinforced concrete with a lot of steel inside, so I expect there will be some effect to the antenna efficiency and radiation pattern. On the second spot, the antenna can be more clear of buildings, but the radials pattern is not symmetrical because il is limited to a strip of land wide half the antenna height. So now is my question: if a tradeoff must be made, what is more important, to have an antenna on the clear or to have the best ground radials system ? A second question: is it possible to estimate the effect of ground symmetry and of buildings presence on the antenna radiation pattern using antenna simulation software like eznec ? Thanks to all Giovanni IZ0SQZ Hello Giovanni, My first impression is for 80m go for the good ground site and for the upper bands go for the clear area. From a man made noise perspective, I would go for the clear area, but of course this one you can check via S/N ratio of received stations. The clear area may result in less interference from your signal in user equipment. Regarding the buildings, are they very large in horizontal size and height or do I have to think of just three isolated buildings without any other buildings behind it (seen from the antenna)? If there were many buildings, I would go for the clear area in both cases. Regarding radiation pattern, I would not worry about this. If you can put the antenna such that you have most of the long radials in two opposite direction only, the effect on radiation pattern is negligible. For the DX case, you will rely on the vertical component only as the horizontal component will vanish more rapidly under decreasing elevation angle. Your radiation pattern (elevation pattern under varying azimuth) depends heavily on ground properties several wavelengths away from the antenna and you have no influence on that. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me very likely. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vertical antenna for DX | Antenna | |||
| antenna ccr site? | Antenna | |||
| vertical antenna | Antenna | |||
| The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
| Vertical HF antenna | Antenna | |||