Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On the yard around my house I have two possible spots where to erect a
multiband vertical, an HF6V. On the first spot it is possible to lay down a symmetrical net of radials as long as the antenna is tall, but the antenna will be close to buildings on tree sides, at a distance about two to four times the antenna height. Buildings in Italy are built by rinforced concrete with a lot of steel inside, so I expect there will be some effect to the antenna efficiency and radiation pattern. On the second spot, the antenna can be more clear of buildings, but the radials pattern is not symmetrical because il is limited to a strip of land wide half the antenna height. So now is my question: if a tradeoff must be made, what is more important, to have an antenna on the clear or to have the best ground radials system ? A second question: is it possible to estimate the effect of ground symmetry and of buildings presence on the antenna radiation pattern using antenna simulation software like eznec ? Thanks to all Giovanni IZ0SQZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical antenna for DX | Antenna | |||
antenna ccr site? | Antenna | |||
vertical antenna | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Vertical HF antenna | Antenna |