Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave VanHorn wrote:
?? More gain is worse? Depends on the TOA. Around Phoenix, we had a mountaintop repeater that we could hit better with a 1/4 wave than with a 5/8 wave when we were close to the base of the mountain upon which it resided. That's where we camped out a lot. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dave VanHorn wrote: ?? More gain is worse? Depends on the TOA. Around Phoenix, we had a mountaintop repeater that we could hit better with a 1/4 wave than with a 5/8 wave when we were close to the base of the mountain upon which it resided. That's where we camped out a lot. I'm aware that there are off cases where the normal rules don't apply, but in general, higher gain and a flatter pattern, is always better than lower gain and heating the clouds.. I've not seen many hairpins out there, and they are just a small bit more to build than the GP. Why is that? Are they just not well known? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Salt Water Ground Plane | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |