| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"InfRes" wrote in message ... Hi, I've noticed most homebuilt amateur antennas use tubing and usually copper, whereas commercial antennas typically use round bar, either steel or Aluminum. I understand the advantages of the materials in terms of electrical conductivity and weather resistance, however I dont understand the pro's and cons of using tube vs round bar? Can you point me to a book that may discuss this? Have studies been done re the effect of a layer of oxidation on the performance of the antenna? Finally, there is plenty of material about designing antennae for a band, but every little about designing it at a particular impedence, can you point me to a discussion on this too? Thanks Steven Electrically there is not much differance in using tubing or rods. It is mainly about the cost, weight and strength. Copper is used by many at home because you can get it at the local stores where aluminum is often hard to come by in lots of towns. Also you can solder to copper where not many can solder or weld aluminum. The impedance is not usually that much concern, Just design for gain and f/b ratio and then match whatever impedance you have to the transmission line you are going to use. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| copper clad steel | Antenna | |||
| Aluminum chassis & steel rivets = bad graound | Boatanchors | |||
| Why is copper better than steel for wire antenna? | Antenna | |||
| Steel to Copper | Antenna | |||
| Still Looking for crankup/foldover steel or aluminum tower | Antenna | |||