Art, buddy, hang in there ...
 

Help is on the way, attempt to hold out! I'd be there sooner, but the
morons are baaaacccck! :-(

Regards,
JS

Art, buddy, hang in there ...
 

On Aug 31, 10:45*pm, John Smith wrote:
Help is on the way, attempt to hold out! *I'd be there sooner, but the
morons are baaaacccck! *:-(

Regards,
JS

John he doesn't bother me. The more he posts the more people
understand what a child he is.
Soon somebody will go to a modeling program and try it out and it will
all be over. I am not fully familiar
with Eznec but I understand it already has a sample
of a coil which makes it easy to duplicate to try out above UHF. A
condensed antenna with extremely high gain is very desirable to the
ham community and elsewhere so interest will win over in the end.
Thanks anyway for the support, you can't be an engineer for very long
if the bridges you build keep falling down and I worked as a senior
engineer with G.E. for most of my life so I have walked the walk.
I forgot to mention that this antenna does not have a formal bandwidth
as it is resonant on all frequencies up to the length of wire used for
the lowest frequency.As the wire only carries a minimum of current it
can be quite thin and resistance is so small it is not a problem to
use
loads of wire and still maintain a condensed antenna. Mine is light
enough to hold up with one hand and place it in the rotor on the tower
top and is good down to top band. Sounds crazy but I have provided the
physics which is supported by my actual antennas as well as the
computer programs.
Regards
Art

Art, buddy, hang in there ...
 

On 8/31/2010 9:41 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
On Aug 31, 10:45 pm, John wrote:
Help is on the way, attempt to hold out! I'd be there sooner, but the
morons are baaaacccck! :-(

Regards,
JS

John he doesn't bother me. The more he posts the more people
understand what a child he is.
...
Regards
Art

I had some spare time today, to just let my mind wander. You know how
mooselums must face mecca each day? I wonder if moohamad ever gave any
advise what direction mooselums should face their antenna? A sloper,
facing mecca would seem to be suitable; Indeed, the antenna would almost
be in a "praying conformation!" I mean, surely, no fault could be found
with a mooselum utilizing one of those babies!

You ever given much thought to that?

Regards,
JS

Art, buddy, hang in there ...
 

On Sep 1, 12:41*am, Art Unwin wrote:
On Aug 31, 10:45*pm, John Smith wrote:

Help is on the way, attempt to hold out! *I'd be there sooner, but the
morons are baaaacccck! *:-(

Regards,
JS

John he doesn't bother me. The more he posts the more people
understand what a child he is.
Soon somebody will go to a modeling program and try it out and it will
all be over. I am not fully familiar
with Eznec but I understand it already has a sample
of a coil which makes it easy to duplicate to try out above UHF. A
condensed antenna with extremely high gain is very desirable to the
ham community and elsewhere so interest will win over in the end.
Thanks anyway for the support, you can't be an engineer for very long
if the bridges you build keep falling down and I worked as a senior
engineer with G.E. for most of my life so I have walked the walk.
I forgot to mention that this antenna does not have a formal bandwidth
as it is resonant on all frequencies up to the length of wire used for
the lowest frequency.As the wire only carries a minimum of current it
can be quite thin and resistance is so small it is not a problem to
use
loads of wire and still maintain a condensed antenna. Mine is light
enough to hold up with one hand and place it in the rotor on the tower
top and is good down to top band. Sounds crazy but I have provided the
physics which is supported by my actual antennas as well as the
computer programs.
Regards
Art

A coil of wire is a poor radiator for the same reason balanced
transmission lines for most all practical purposes do not radiate.

Jimmie