Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 5:51*pm, John Smith wrote:
OK, I'll ask, "I am correct in thinking that most are using a 'voltage balun' (ruthroff 1:4) as the 'Low Loss Matching Transformer' and a 'current balun' (guanella 1:1) as the 'Special-High Isolation Line Isolator?'" That's the theory behind the Carolina Windom. Whether it actually performs up to expectations is questionable. The marketing hype acknowledges that the 4:1 voltage balun will cause common-mode current on the coax which is expected for off-center-fed dipoles. They seem to assume that the "Isolator" located 20 feet from the dipole feedpoint is an ideal device with an infinite choking impedance. If it were that, the antenna would work exactly as advertised. Unfortunately, there's no such thing as an ideal isolator so we are zeroing in on what is possible in reality and what must remain as marketing hype. From my modeling, it appears that the isolator works well for any frequency where the length of the coax from the feedpoint to the isolator is approximately an odd multiple of 1/4WL. That occurs on 20m and 10m. Unfortunately, my modeling indicates that RF-in-the-shack may be a problem on 40m and I would be tempted to add an ugly balun. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RF Systems "MLB" {Magnetic Longwire Balun} - What Is It ? | Shortwave | |||
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? | Policy | |||
MFJ Tuner "Current Balun" conversion. | Antenna | |||
ABOUT - The original "WINDOM" Antenna and more . . . | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave |