About Us

April 20th 04, 06:26 PM

On 20 Apr 2004 09:06:35 -0700, (N2EY) wrote:
These apologies ring false. The issue of gaps is desperate and the
selection of tubular has no basis in special characteristics. All
such considerations MUST yield to simple scaling. For instance, if
you need 0.8 and have 0.9, there is no magic formula beyond
proportions necessary to achieve "what should be."

I disagree! In the QST article, Lattin describes an 80/40 dipole using
his method. It has wires dangling from the stub junctions to get 40
meter resonance.

Hi Jim,

OK, you disagree, but with what? Scaling will ALWAYS answer
everything but the mystical apologies.

Most important to me is that the antenna offers no real advantages
over, say, a conventional trap dipole. Yet it offers many
disadvantages, such as mechanical frailty and difficulty of
duplication.

This is more pilot error than design error (which has its own
problems, of course).

And again - what advantages does it have over, say, a W3DZZ trap
dipole?

I see no such issues if the theory were hammered out. It is plainly
these readings of tea leaves that frustrate construction, because when
a design is described, it is most clear and concise - it just doesn't
work is all.

Like I said, I've done some measures and added a dozen more since.
The results are interesting. I can come up with a four band antenna
without too much trouble; however, getting those bands into Ham
regions (all of them) is another matter. I can do this with a simple
run of twin lead, and one strategically placed short between them.

This antenna (usefully resonant or otherwise) is no worse than any
wire strung between poles - just two wires instead of one, hardly what
I would call fragile. If it has an advantage over your W3DZZ trap
dipole, I leave that strictly in the eye of the beholder as I have
full faith it won't be any worse.

Any way, such work offers a step towards an antenna with MORE gain
(and more wire, a third one) by constructing a Franklin Array style of
antenna. True, not a multi bander, but I am not particularly nailed
to the floor over that.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole.	Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA	Antenna	8	February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Mobile Ant L match ?	Henry Kolesnik	Antenna	14	January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp?	lbbs	Antenna	16	December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna	Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA	Antenna	12	October 16th 03 07:44 PM

Menu

About Us