Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen writes:
I have been exploring models of a quarter wave monopole over a set of radials on 80m using NEC4 models. If my models are valid, and they use 'average ground', the indication is that while it may require a large number of buried radials (16) before efficiency levels off a bit, similar efficiency can be obtained with just three radials elevated more than 100mm above the soil. N6LF made extensive measurements and essenstially confirmed this. He wrote a 7 part series of articles for QEX. You can download them at his site: http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/2009/1...periments.html This leaves me wondering why the popularity of extensive fields of buried radials for the lower bands. Practicality. In most cases, you either want to be able to walk above the radials, (i.e. bury them or leave them on the ground) or below them. This means at least 2 - 2.5 m up, and there will be some sagging. Essentially, your vertical just got that much shorter. But if what remains is tall enough, it's a great choice. If a friendly farmer lets you borrow a field in wintertime, stringing four elevated radials is a lot less work than rolling out 32 on the ground. Jon LA4RT, Trondheim, Norway |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevated Screwdriver And Radials? | Antenna | |||
Gap antennas, elevated radials | Antenna | |||
Buried Radials - a new look! | Antenna | |||
Distance between outer ends of buried radials | Antenna |