| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
September 30th 10, 09:39 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Elevated vs buried radials
On Sep 30, 3:13*pm, Owen wrote:
Could I be forgive(n) in thinking that the popular, nearly universal, way is to uplift the BL&E research at MF and apply it to 80m? The BL&E experiments were conducted using 3 MHz signals, so their applicability to the 80m band is not a large uplift. |
|
#2
September 30th 10, 10:04 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Elevated vs buried radials
On 01/10/10 06:39, Richard Fry wrote:
On Sep 30, 3:13 pm, wrote: Could I be forgive(n) in thinking that the popular, nearly universal, way is to uplift the BL&E research at MF and apply it to 80m? The BL&E experiments were conducted using 3 MHz signals, so their applicability to the 80m band is not a large uplift. I stand corrected. I have read the paper many times, and my recollection was that it was below 2MHz. Must be time to read it again! Owen |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Elevated Screwdriver And Radials? | Antenna | |||
| Gap antennas, elevated radials | Antenna | |||
| Buried Radials - a new look! | Antenna | |||
| Distance between outer ends of buried radials | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
