| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
September 30th 10, 11:17 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Elevated vs buried radials
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:13:56 +1000, Owen wrote:
Could I be forgive in thinking that the popular, nearly universal, way is to uplift the BL&E research at MF and apply it to 80m? The original field research was done at 3 MHz - very much closer to 80M than to 300M. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#2
October 1st 10, 12:07 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Elevated vs buried radials
On 01/10/10 08:17, Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:13:56 +1000, wrote: Could I be forgive in thinking that the popular, nearly universal, way is to uplift the BL&E research at MF and apply it to 80m? The original field research was done at 3 MHz - very much closer to 80M than to 300M. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Yes, I accepted that advice from Richard Fry an hour or so earlier... Owen |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Elevated Screwdriver And Radials? | Antenna | |||
| Gap antennas, elevated radials | Antenna | |||
| Buried Radials - a new look! | Antenna | |||
| Distance between outer ends of buried radials | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
