Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote in
: On Oct 1, 12:45 am, Owen Duffy wrote: .... Using NEC-4 to incorporate buried (or elevated) radials into the model should show groundwave fields within 1 km of the monopole that are very close to the theoretical maximum for the applied power when radiated along a perfect ground plane, if the model is optimal, and accurate. It may do, I can not comment. My interest is for an antenna for sky wave path, and I have not explored ground wave performance. In the cases of 32 buried radials and three elevated radials, the patterns are similar, efficiencies are similar, and maximum gain is similar. Reducing the number of buried radials degrades its performance significantly. The elevated radials configuration allows a shortened radiator with capacity hat with negligible degradation in performance. I haven't modelled the same thing over buried radials, but I expect performance degradation would be significantly worse. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevated Screwdriver And Radials? | Antenna | |||
Gap antennas, elevated radials | Antenna | |||
Buried Radials - a new look! | Antenna | |||
Distance between outer ends of buried radials | Antenna |