Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm, I had not though about the noise vs signal, and as Doc points, out my
better half would want to know how it was I had nothing better to do w/ my time. Thanks. "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 05:18:53 GMT, "The Masked Marvel" wrote: For the sake of AM reception (particularly distant cities, sky wave at night) iwould it hellp to use a longer whip, __________________________________________________ _______ For receiving only, I doubt a longer whip would help with AM. If you're already getting a signal above the noise level, making the antenna longer would only make both the signal and noise louder, and that in itself may cause overload problems. If you can tune in between stations and hear fairly loud atmospheric static, stop there. More is not better. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
I need links for antennas on 88-107 Mhz (radio AM/FM) | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |