Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 5, 9:05*pm, tom wrote:
On 12/5/2010 3:01 PM, Art Unwin wrote: On Dec 5, 1:52 pm, Art *wrote: On Dec 5, 12:51 pm, Sean *wrote: Hi ... SNIP Hi Sean Re acceleration of charge. First I have little training in physics so I am not pre programmed. I am an old retired mechanical engineer Stating facts as I see them. Adding time variant to a Gaussian field results in Maxwell equation for radiation establishing a particle as a carrier of charge. Solar particles are attracted to diamagnetic surfaces which are also used for radiators. Only one resistance reflects energy supplied to a charge. the other resistance of skin depth is a loss.When a external magnetic field is removed from a radiator so is skin depth and current flows on the surface. For Maximum efficiency the particle must be raised for friction reasons and a displacement current does just that. Now a Faraday cage I see as a separation of fields imposed on a particle,The magnetic portion stays on the outside of the shield and the electric field alignes itself on the inside cancels leaving only AC current , a reverse of radiation transmission For a solenoid we have all the above features, A Faraday shield around a radiator. The radiator is a Meander form and resistive or non frequency relevant. Now the radiator is energized for transmission B reaches saturation energy transferred to H until the coil becomes diamagnetic. The displacement current raises resting particle neutralizing gravity and is in equilibrium.All energy applied to the particle is now equal to acceleration of charge for maximum efficiency such that the thrust and spin allows for straight line trajectory. All the above can be seen from superconductor reaction equivilency. The two vectors of thrust and helical spin applied to the particle are Newtons reaction to Earth's position in the Universe and reflected by the two vectors of a time variant current which is also the same as a boundary break to release a particle from a Gaussian field during the Big Bang and the basic forces envisaged by Einstein for the Standard Model ala the twisted ladder of life itself. Regards Art *xg Searn It has taken me several years to convince some of the transition from electrostatics of Gauss to the Mathematics of Maxwell to establish particles instead of waves., Probably the cgs units create confusion. I would have liked to start from the "double slit" experiment which has created a monkey fist stuck in a jar. If only people could step back from a stubborn position it would be an easy transfer of thought from a double slit experiment to one of a array of slot antennas to get things back on track. The last few years has taught me that many see passing the amateur radio exam as a passport equivalent into the society of physics and the protector of printed books of the ARRL so I am clearly outnumbered with respect to the resistance to change. Sean Amusing isn't he? *He's written thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of line of this, none exactly the same. If you want to start a "discussion" with him it will never end unless he says it does, and often not then. 73 tom K0TAR Probably just a lonely old fart, could be any of us in a few years. Sounds like some of us are already getting there.I knew a guy that worked with him, said he was pretty sharp back in the day. Jimmie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Physics forums censor ship | Antenna | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics | CB | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |