LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 14th 10, 06:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default antenna physics question

Registered User wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:29:24 -0000, wrote:

Registered User wrote:

You can call it meaningless babble but in its simplest form
dimensional metadata provides meaning and additional information to
raw data.


Yes, meaningless babble.

The phrase "antenna efficiency is 80%" says everything you need to know.

The phrase "antenna efficiency" is non-dimensional metadata
and to quote Mr. Clark
-quote-
Given that "efficiency" has been hijacked, the phrase above could as
easily relate to wind load.
-end quote-

The phrase "engine efficiency is 35%" says everything yoy need to know.

You assume that engine efficiency is only and always measured in terms
of energy efficiency.


Of course it is, that is basic physics and the definition.

Other things are other things and have qualifiers, especially if they use
the word "efficiency", otherwise it is just ignorant babble.

snip babble

And if antennas is the topic to begin with, the phrase "efficiency is 80%"
says everything you need to know.

No "dimensional metadata" required.


Non-dimensional metadata (antennas) is provided as the topic and the
result contains non-dimensional metadata (efficiency) as well.


The phrase in question is "dimensional metadata" and now you are switching
the subject to "non-dimensional metadata".

As Mr.
Clark pointed out "antenna efficiency" is a potentially ambiguous
phrase. Such ambiguity can be eliminated by using dimensional metadata
e.g. antenna efficiency calculated as the ratio of power radiated to
input power.


The definition of antenna efficiency is the "ratio of power radiated to
input power", so stating that is redundant.

snip more babble

I suppose you argue with writers of recipes when they say "add 1 cup of milk"
saying they should say "pour milk into a measuring cup, that is a cup used for
measuring liquids, until the milk level, that is the level in the measuring
cup, reaches the mark on the measuring that denotes the meauring cup contains
1 fluid cup, in this case the milk, then pour the contents of the measuring
cup into..".


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Physics forums censor ship Art Unwin Antenna 75 January 14th 10 12:10 AM
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! Dave Antenna 16 December 14th 07 12:17 PM
Physics according to toad Cmd Buzz Corey Policy 5 May 28th 05 04:57 PM
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics Nicolai Carpathia CB 16 June 12th 04 08:08 PM
Ye canna change the lars o' physics Dave VanHorn CB 5 August 2nd 03 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017