Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Registered User wrote:
Precisely why metadata is so important to describe data.The generic term 'antenna efficiency' does not provide enough metadata to describe the true meaning of the measure. Only if you are an ignorant twit that doesn't understand the definition of "antenna efficiency" and has to have the definition spelled out to him each and every time. snip babble There are many different expressions that calculate efficiency, so wouldn't the adornment be the context aka metadata which describes the expression used to calculate the result? If I write "80% efficiency"on a piece of paper and hand it to an engineer, how can the engineer know what is 80% efficient without any metadata being provided? The engineer would use the context under which the number was provided. If there were no context the engineer would be justified in concluding that you were a babbling mental case. snip long winded, grandiose babble -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Physics forums censor ship | Antenna | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics | CB | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |