Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K1TTT wrote:
On Dec 14, 6:41Â*pm, wrote: K1TTT wrote: On Dec 14, 4:54Â*pm, wrote: Registered User wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:51:07 -0000, wrote: Have you the slightest clue what the word "context" means? Absolutely, yes I do. In turn I will ask do you know what metadata is? Yes, and I also know what ice cream is, both of which are irrelevant to the discussion. Both dimensional and non-dimensional metadata provide context. Non-dimensional metadata doesn't always provide the complete context. Dimensional metadata provides greater context because it conveys more detailed and specific information. Only an ignorant, anal retentive git would think that basic terminology has to be defined each and every time it is used. "Antenna efficiency is 20%" has all the information required and if the discussion is about antennas, "efficiency is 20%" has all the information required. When data gets shared among multiple parties it is important that a ubiquitous language is used to describe the data and its meaning. The term "antenna efficiency" has a unique and unambigous definition and can be found in any textbook on electromagnetics. really? Â*i don't see either 'efficiency' or 'antenna efficiency' in either my 2nd edition of jackson's classical electrodynamics, or ramo,whinnery, and van duzer's fields and waves in communication electronics... if you know where those terms might be defined in either of those please let me know, maybe the indexes aren't complete or something. So change "any textbook" to "many textbooks". -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. well, i kept looking.. arrl antenna book doesn't have it, but mine is rather old maybe more recent ones have it. aha! found efficiency in the ieee handbook of antenna design... but it has subtopics: aperture beam cassegrain cross-polar depolarisation in offset reflectors illumination offset antennas polarisation radiation now exactly which definition do you consider the 'unique and unambiguous' one?? The one that one normally means when not using a qualifier, radiation. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Physics forums censor ship | Antenna | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics | CB | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |