eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,
--
John Wood (Code 5520) e-mail:
Naval Research Laboratory
4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20375-5337

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

"J. B. Wood" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to stay
on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and comment is
appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

Treasures and prepared minds usually are in hard places.

Love read any post on this NG, spam is not a issue.

My 2 cents,
-.-. --.-

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

In "J. B. Wood"
wrote:

Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

A decent news client and news provider and well-populated filter and
killfiles makes reading any newsgroup a much nicer experience.

--
Bert Hyman W0RSB St. Paul, MN

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

On Dec 23, 12:30*pm, "J. B. Wood" wrote:
Hello, all. *With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. *Your time and
comment is appreciated. *Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,
--
John Wood (Code 5520) * * * *e-mail:
Naval Research Laboratory
4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20375-5337

what is eham.net?

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:49:29 -0800 (PST), K1TTT wrote:
On Dec 23, 12:30*pm, "J. B. Wood" wrote:
Hello, all. *With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. *Your time and
comment is appreciated. *Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

what is eham.net?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eham.net&l=1

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

On Dec 24, 7:15*pm, Allodoxaphobia
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:49:29 -0800 (PST), K1TTT wrote:
On Dec 23, 12:30 pm, "J. B. Wood" wrote:
Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

what is eham.net?

*http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eham.net&l=1

well, duh... seems to be the hard way to get there if i really wanted
to... the point is, why bother?

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:30:42 -0500, J. B. Wood wrote:

Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

eham sucks
they "moderate" like a communist regime
I was kicked off for trying to resurrect a 1970s model linear that was
made for ham radio but was popular among the CBers of the time. I guess
to be a ham, you must purchase equipment from one of the eham sponsors?

eham is only trolled with a bunch of old dumb hams who have to have their
great grand children or nurse maids turn the computer on for them each
morning so they can go on a destructive rage with everybody young and new
to radio.

eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*
 

On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:15:31 +0000, Allodoxaphobia wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:49:29 -0800 (PST), K1TTT wrote:
On Dec 23, 12:30Â*pm, "J. B. Wood" wrote:
Hello, all. Â*With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm
beginning to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the
time to stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Â*Your time
and comment is appreciated. Â*Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

what is eham.net?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eham.net&l=1

HAHAHA Nice example!

Exactly why one should avoid eham!

The people who frequent there are simply too stupid to understand sarcasm
or anything complicated beyond what's on fox news. A disgrace to amateur
radio.