| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
April 13th 04, 04:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:52:22 +0000 (UTC), wrote: Utter nonsense. Hi Jim, I've performed work with Battelle Centers for Public Health Research & Evaluation and this very matter has been studied to record and verify every statement I've offered. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC You said: "There is NO MINIMUM EXPOSURE LEVEL to Mercury. No matter how little, it has some debilitating effect that is measurable." What is the "debilitating effect that is measurable" of exposure to 1 atom of mercury? How about 2 atoms of mercury? Three? According to the the ATSDR: "The EPA has set a limit of 2 parts of mercury per billion parts of drinking water (2 ppb). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set a maximum permissible level of 1 part of methylmercury in a million parts of seafood (1 ppm). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has set limits of 0.1 milligram of organic mercury per cubic meter of workplace air (0.1 mg/m?) and 0.05 mg/m? of metallic mercury vapor for 8-hour shifts and 40-hour work weeks." Looks to me like there are at least three entities other than Battelle Centers for Public Health Research & Evaluation that found minimum levels. -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
