| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
April 19th 04, 01:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote:
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: Second, constructions of wavelengths longer than for 2M are laughable ... For a horizontal antenna??? keep the chuckles comin' You know I don't care for verticals. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#2
April 19th 04, 03:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That IS funny!!!
Everybody knows vertical mercury antennas perform better than horizontal ones!!! ;-) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
