Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only critical length of a dipole is the end-to-end length. The length
of the loading coil when inserted in the antenna should not affect this. Locate the centre of the loading coil at the point where it is supposed to be along the antenna and reduce the lengths of the antenna elements on either side of it by half of the length of the coil. In other words, the total reduction in length of the antenna elements is equal to the coil length, leaving the original dipole end-to-end length unchanged. ---- Reg, G4FGQ =================================== "George" wrote in message link.net... I have a question that's probably easy for anyone with practical experience building UHF antennas. I need to make a shortened dipole (from tubing) at 450 MHz without sacrificing too much gain compared to full-size. I have a design based on EZNEC. Total shortened "half-wave" dipole length is 0.32 lambda. Half of that of course is in each of the two elements. There is a loading coil in the middle of each element. EZNEC assumes zero length, non-radiating coils. In reality, the coil length is significant compared to the element length. So, how do I build this thing considering the real coil length? Can the coil be inserted in the middle of each element without reducing the element length by the length of the coil? In other words, would final element length be 0.32 lambda plus coil length? Or, should the elements be shortened to maintain overall 0.32 lambda end-to-end length? Thanks. George K6GW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
These loading coils theories | Antenna | |||
Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Loading Coils in 20th ARRL Antenna Book | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |