Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
Thanks very much for the links. They furnished quite a bit of information about silver, its alloys, and its salts, that I didn't know. They do seem to support what I had thought about sulfide being more common than oxide, and added chloride to the list of common tarnishes. And maybe the reason for the elusiveness of information on the conductivity of silver oxide is because of the strange nonlinear effects reported in the first paper. Hopefully Jim will be able to fill us in about that, since he apparently has some information on the oxides. I'm frankly startled that any oxide can have conductivity within even a few orders of magnitude of a good pure metal, so I hope he'll post the information soon. One of the links notes that only silver alloys (particularly with copper) tend to oxidize, so in order to get a coating of silver oxide, you'd need to coat your wire not with pure silver, but with an alloy that's somewhat more resistive than copper to begin with. Does that mean, Jim, that the conductivity of the plated wire would actually improve as it oxidizes? A paper I read some time ago showed that silver plating nearly always consists not of pure silver but of some alloy (as one of the links pointed out), and nearly all those alloys have a conductivity less than copper -- some, much less. So if you want to reap whatever benefit there might be in silver corrosion products over copper ones, you'll have to put up with lower conductivity in the uncorroded wire. Seems to me to make more sense to use enameled or insulated copper wire to begin with, but I guess some folks think the appearance of silver is worth the hassle. The only resistivity information I have is for AgS, which is apparently a common corrosion product, and its resistivity is about 100,000 times as great as silver. This isn't necessarily bad, since both a perfect conductor and a perfect insulator provide a lossless coating. The loss incurred by conductors of intermediate quality depends on the frequency and coating thickness, so it can be hard to draw conclusions about what compound might be better than another except in a specific case. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Mike Coslo wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: Ah, finally, someone who knows what the conductivity of silver oxide is. Although I believe silver sulfide is much more common than oxide, I've been able to find the conductivity of the sulfide but not the oxides. Just what are the conductivities of the silver oxides (AgO and Ag2O)? Which are we most likely to find on the outsides of wires? Are they really more common than the sulfide? Roy Lewallen, W7EL An interesting and eventually amusing link on silover sulfide http://www.eecs.cwru.edu/misc/AMANDA...er_revised.doc another: http://www.brushwellman.com/alloy/tech_lit/sep02.pdf and this: http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/reference/tech_papers/chudnovsky2002-paper-silver-corrosion-whiskers.pdf It is interesting that the NASA paper refers to silver sulfide as non-conductive, while the first paper gives a short and tantilizing tidbit about forcing it into conductivity. Hope you find the links interesting! - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |