Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cecil Moore" wrote
Take your NEC helical model and adjust the frequency to approximately double the resonant frequency and take a look at the current distribution. I have already done an illustration based on the currents in the NEC comparison posted earlier, showing a helix and a linear monopole each about 6 degrees in aperture (link below). This link shows that even though the length of wire used in the helix is 3.14 X the length used in the linear monopole, the current distribution along their apertures essentially is the same, as will be the directivity and radiation pattern of both versions. This same equivalence would apply to the current distribution, directivity and pattern of a linear, 1/4-WL monopole and a helically-wound monopole that was 1/4-WL in aperture, but contained 1/2-WL of coiled wire. http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...le_Current.gif |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fractal Sleeve for Monopoles? | Antenna | |||
Magnetic monopoles | Antenna | |||
Helically-wound Monopoles | Antenna | |||
Vertical dipole, helically wound - comments? | Antenna | |||
End Effect on folded dipoles/monopoles? | Antenna |