Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil -
The link below shows the NEC-2D results for the 3-m monopole whose geometry I posted earlier -- at its frequency of first self-resonance, and at 3X that frequency. We don't disagree as far as current distribution is concerned, but maybe in the belief that such a helix at an operating frequency that is 3X its first resonance has a practical benefit for users. The reason that it may not is traceable to the radiation resistances at each frequency w.r.t. a fixed amount of antenna system loss. http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...d_Harmonic.gif |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fractal Sleeve for Monopoles? | Antenna | |||
Magnetic monopoles | Antenna | |||
Helically-wound Monopoles | Antenna | |||
Vertical dipole, helically wound - comments? | Antenna | |||
End Effect on folded dipoles/monopoles? | Antenna |