Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 mar, 10:17, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
Uzytkownik "Wimpie" napisal w ... On 24 mar, 18:42, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: "Wimpie" napisal w ... On 24 mar, 10:53, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: "This finding had practical applications for telegraph communications. For example, Heaviside actually solved one of the biggest problems affecting long distance telegraph and telephone communication in 1887 -distortion. It was known that different frequencies travel with different speeds on a long cable. For example, the low bass frequencies in a voice signal travel faster than the high treble frequencies. When the cable is long enough, the frequencies smear, and both voice and telegraph signals become garbled noise. Heaviside used his equations to show that if inductances (i.e.., a small coil of wire) were added along the length of the cable, the distortion could be reduced." From:http://www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Oliver_Heaviside " It was known that different frequencies travel with different speeds on a long cable". Is the same in air and space? S* Hello Szczepan, Search for the effective permittivity of media with free electrons (plasma). You will see that the effective permittivity changes with frequency, hence the phase velocity. Don't look strange to find apparent permittivities below the value for vacuum. Just ignore DC magnetic field as this complicates that math significantly. Hello Wim, So you confirm that in plasma is the same as in metal. No But what with the space. The AM should be better than FM to communicate with the Mars. Is/were FM used for long distances? As power is limiting factor, a modulation scheme with coherent detection and digital decoding will give best performance (best Eb/N0 ratio for certain BER) I think. So it is not just a question of AM or FM/PM, but more how it is processed at the receiver. *Processing power changed over time, so theoretically the best method may not be used because of technical limitations. Were done the proper experiments in the early years of radio? S* Best regards, Wim I am simple asking if radio people have trouble with the fact that the speed of waves are frequeny dependent. I am interesting with the real radio waves in the real media. Here is an example Pulsars are spinning neutron stars that emit pulses at very regular intervals ranging from milliseconds to seconds. Astronomers believe that the pulses are emitted simultaneously over a wide range of frequencies. However, as observed on Earth, the components of each pulse emitted at higher radio frequencies arrive before those emitted at lower frequencies. This dispersion occurs because of the ionised component of the interstellar medium, which makes the group velocity frequency dependent S Try to find document "Descanso4--Voyager_new.pdf" (very likely the first result in google). This describes the Voyager communication system. It is now more the 10 light hours from us (as far as I know). As far as I know, they don't equalize to correct for in band dispersion (due to wave propagation). Maybe other people have better info on this. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Waves vs Particles | Antenna | |||
OT - Speed Test - ignore. - File 1 of 1 - Speed.rtf (01/31) | Radio Photos | |||
On the really Short Waves... | Shortwave | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna |