Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those impedances seem pretty low for a folded monopole, unless the
conductor diameter is large. When modeling two parallel wires like a folded monopole or dipole with any NEC-2 based program, it's essential that the segment junctions be aligned. For the folded dipole or monopole, simply make the wires the same lengths and give them the same number of segments. Roy Lewallen, W7EL John wrote: "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... I'll once again separate the "antenna" from the "transmission line" to make it easier to see what's happening. Okay! I did it! I didn't separate out the transmission line from the antenna. Instead, I just modeled the folded monopole. I plotted on a Smith chart the resultant terminal impedance as the vertical element varied from .23 wavelengths to .245 wavelengths. It went from (73.31 - J 40.81) through (85.71 + J 0.7908) to (93.59 + J 22.56). Easy! I found that a vertical element of .2325 wavelengths gave me 76.05 - J 30.27 ohms. That's a sweet spot for this particular antenna in that feeding it with a .143 wavelength piece of 75 Ohm coax will match to a 50 Ohm source. To further my education, I also checked the anti-resonance point you mentioned. Thanks! John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
Folded Dipole | Antenna | |||
Tuning a folded Dipole? | Antenna | |||
Folded monopole w/ Al sailboat mast? | Antenna | |||
Folded dipole? | Antenna |