Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always been of the opinion that when it comes to wire antennas, the
prevailing rule of thumb is "the higher the better". However, I am about to deploy a 270' 160m antenna, and -- based on available trees -- I can either install an inverted vee with a 50 foot apex, along a straight vertical plane, with ends dropping off to about 15 feet high; or a dipole at 50 feet, with the antenna in a straight horizontal plane (center and ends at 50 feet), but the vertical plane in a V beam configuration of about 90 degrees. I enjoy chasing DX - so which configuration should I choose? Would the slight vertical component of the inverted vee offer me a better take-off angle than the horizontal dipole? Or should I opt for the "higher the better" route? Thanks in advance for your responses, -larry K8UT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |