![]() |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:46:03 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote:
I have repaired many devices that "I didn't do anything to it - it just happened!" - 73 de Mike N3LI - Well, an admission of guilt would certainly be handy. Before anything can be repaired, a suitable culprit must be found or assigned. Nothing can be repaired without first establishing the blame. If the owner confesses to gross negligence, the repair can proceed normally. However, if he refuses to accept the blame, someone else must be found. That's often difficult as one should not blame the person doing the repairs. It is sometimes convenient to loan the instrument to a fellow ham, and then blame them for blowing it up. As a last resort, inflicting inquisition style torture on the owner will eventually extract a confession, although subsequently getting paid for the repair might be difficult. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:48:55 -0700, Jim Lux
wrote: Actually, humidity doesn't affect the charging all that much. What humidity affects is the leakage current across dirty insulators. P-static is a nice example of static charging in rain at 100% humidity, for instance. It's true that dry dust or blowing snow are more notorious for charging, but just the clear sky current could provide some charging. Well, what I've noticed is that when the humidity is low, I throw lightning bolts when I walk across the carpet or slide across the car seat. When the humidity is higher, then I don't have those problems. I don't know how this correlates to charge buildup on an antenna, but my guess(tm) is that there would be some connection. Also, any antenna design, that would fry an analyzer, might also fry a radio front end. It's possible, but unlikely. I don't know about that. A LNA with a FET front end might be an example of a ESD sensitive thing, but for HF, where we're usually more concerned about instantaneous dynamic range and strong signal handling, a more robust front end is common. One of those +20dBm LO mixers, for instance, is going to be quite robust. In a past life, I helped design a marine HF xceiver, which had a +7dBm mixer (SBL-1) in the front end. Between the antenna and the mixer, was a low pass filter with no capacitors to ground. There were a few failures, most of which were due to nearby lightning hits. However some of these failures were blamed on static buildup. The higher level mixers will certainly survive a bigger blast through the antenna. But that's because there's a torroidal isolation transformer between the antenna and the diode ring. See typical +23dBm mixer at: http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/RAY-1+.pdf Also note that the maximum RF power is 350mw, which is well within the range of what can be delivered by a good solid ESD blast via the antenna. I don't think it will fry the diodes, but might blow the tiny wire used in the torroids into a fuse. I can think of a lot of antennas that won't be too hard on a radio front end that would cook a delicate detector diode hooked directly up to the antenna. Ok. I'll admit that the MJF-269 diodes, which are directly connected to the antenna terminal, are more easily fried than a receiver front end, which has a mess of circuitry, and possibly an antenna coupler, between the antenna and the front end. I carry a neon lamp line tester in my tool box. It's useful for checking AC power, but also for detecting high voltages on antenna terminals. It's amazing what I find at broadcast sites. There's a whole literature on making neon lamp blinkers with an antenna and a ground. These days, it's called "energy scavenging" or "RF energy harvesting". http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/scavenging-free-green-power-from-radio-waves-35622 I used to have a 4 watt fluorescent lamp on top of my mobile antenna that flickered with the transmitted envelope. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On 9/7/2011 11:43 AM, dave wrote:
Jeff Liebermann wrote: ohms-guesser). It therefore seems possible that the owner had transmitted into the instrument (even though he denies it). Why would anyone connect that antenna analyzer to a transmitter (unless using the BNC?) Oh.. that's an easy mistake to make. Bunch of coax with connectors lying on the floor, hook up the wrong one. Hook a switch up incorrectly. Coax switch without enough isolation (100W transmitter with a 20dB isolation switch is a watt into the analyzer..) Anyone who has never accidentally cooked a piece of test equipment just hasn't been working long enough. |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
In article ,
Jim Lux wrote: Anyone who has never accidentally cooked a piece of test equipment just hasn't been working long enough. "Experience is directly proportional to equipment destroyed." I think I blew up my first piece of test gear at the age of 14 or so... tried to measure line voltage, with the VOM control still set on "ohms". POP! Fortunately it was just one resistor... I eventually replaced it, and I still have that old 1000 ohm/volt VOM (a 1965-vintage Lafayette) sitting in a drawer somewhere. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On 9/7/2011 11:47 AM, Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:48:55 -0700, Jim wrote: but just the clear sky current could provide some charging. There is a earth-sky current in the femtoamperes per cm² that has a constant potential gradient on the order of 600V/m (or something like that). This current is the return path for all lightning strike charge transfers, world-wide. a few pA/sq meter and a kV/meter field is how I always remember it (in round numbers) It's small, that's true. Few dipoles are co-planar, parallel wrt ground. Actually, humidity doesn't affect the charging all that much. What humidity affects is the leakage current across dirty insulators. Which could easily overwhelm this femtoampere charge where a gigaOhm leakage is trivial (zealous Hams using teflon technology?). Well.. Consider a 20 meter long wire hanging 10 meters above the ground (half a 80m dipole) so now you're talking tens of pA, 100 Meg isolation isn't hard to get with clean insulators. That 20 m wire is like a 850 pF capacitor. If assume, say, 25 pA charging current, you get a volt every 42 seconds. After half an hour or so, you're up to 40 volts or so.. Granted it's not a lot of Joules.. (heck, probably not even a microjoule).. So fair weather charging isn't likely to kill your MFJ.. Back to the dust/rain/induction charging, which can certainly get the levels needed. |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
Dave Platt wrote:
I think I blew up my first piece of test gear at the age of 14 or so... tried to measure line voltage, with the VOM control still set on "ohms". POP! Fortunately it was just one resistor... I eventually replaced it, and I still have that old 1000 ohm/volt VOM (a 1965-vintage Lafayette) sitting in a drawer somewhere. Were you involved with THE pinball machine? Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM Making your enemy reliant on software you support is the best revenge. |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On 9/7/2011 10:01 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:48:55 -0700, Jim wrote: Actually, humidity doesn't affect the charging all that much. What humidity affects is the leakage current across dirty insulators. P-static is a nice example of static charging in rain at 100% humidity, for instance. It's true that dry dust or blowing snow are more notorious for charging, but just the clear sky current could provide some charging. Well, what I've noticed is that when the humidity is low, I throw lightning bolts when I walk across the carpet or slide across the car seat. When the humidity is higher, then I don't have those problems. I don't know how this correlates to charge buildup on an antenna, but my guess(tm) is that there would be some connection. It has to do with the leakage currents discharging you when it's more humid. Interestingly, humid air has a higher breakdown field than dry air. In a past life, I helped design a marine HF xceiver, which had a +7dBm mixer (SBL-1) in the front end. Between the antenna and the mixer, was a low pass filter with no capacitors to ground. There were a few failures, most of which were due to nearby lightning hits. However some of these failures were blamed on static buildup. And, you can take ESD hits that degrade, but don't destroy, the part. I've got some LNAs in my desk drawer that appear to work just fine, except the NF is a bit higher than it used to be. |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On 9/8/2011 1:17 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
In , Jim wrote: Anyone who has never accidentally cooked a piece of test equipment just hasn't been working long enough. "Experience is directly proportional to equipment destroyed." I think I blew up my first piece of test gear at the age of 14 or so... tried to measure line voltage, with the VOM control still set on "ohms". POP! Fortunately it was just one resistor... I eventually replaced it, and I still have that old 1000 ohm/volt VOM (a 1965-vintage Lafayette) sitting in a drawer somewhere. So, you only did it *once* in all this time? Every few years I do the same thing, except the fuse catches my error. John KD5YI |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
On 9/8/2011 1:30 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
And, you can take ESD hits that degrade, but don't destroy, the part. I've got some LNAs in my desk drawer that appear to work just fine, except the NF is a bit higher than it used to be. How do you know it was ESD that caused the degradation? |
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter
In article ,
Jim Lux wrote: Well.. Consider a 20 meter long wire hanging 10 meters above the ground (half a 80m dipole) so now you're talking tens of pA, 100 Meg isolation isn't hard to get with clean insulators. That 20 m wire is like a 850 pF capacitor. If assume, say, 25 pA charging current, you get a volt every 42 seconds. After half an hour or so, you're up to 40 volts or so.. Granted it's not a lot of Joules.. (heck, probably not even a microjoule).. So fair weather charging isn't likely to kill your MFJ.. Back to the dust/rain/induction charging, which can certainly get the levels needed. I've observed clear-air charge on a TV antenna (about 30' above ground level) which was sufficient to create a visible spark when I touched the center connector of the coax to a grounded static-drain block. No rain at the time, no appreciable amount of dust (SF Bay area)... just clear air with a mild breeze. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com