RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Losses in shunt-fed towers (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/173231-losses-shunt-fed-towers.html)

Antonio Vernucci September 9th 11 08:10 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly big
HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a
motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed
capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across the
3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the
band. The antenna works fine and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops at
the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to
about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could be
a source of significant losses.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the tuner
capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500
MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing through
the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get
should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect
some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes the
antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire with
a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc. I am
wondering whether such a high voltage could constitute, by itself, a source of
extra loss. Please note that the wire coming down from the tower is connected
directly to the vacuum capacitor terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I do
not see a place where power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage, other
than perhaps in the humid air (?).

I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on the tower,
but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to tune across the whole
3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause some
significant loss?

Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


Richard Clark September 9th 11 10:51 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:10:08 +0200, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote:

For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly big
HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a
motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed
capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across the
3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the
band.


Hi Antonio,

Describe the "shunt." (I presume it is a long wire from the tuner,
standing off 10cm or so, up maybe 5 - 10 meters where it attaches to
the tower? Can I also presume that the tower goes to ground at the
base?)

The antenna works fine and I receive good reports.


And so it would seem this would be the end of the post. But no.....

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops at
the antenna end


End? There are at least two, and perhaps you mean the end of the
shunt at the tuner? If by "end" you mean up at the very top, then
high voltage would be expected (but worry about it would not be
expected).

By this point, there are a lot of gaps in the description (at least
for me).

(about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to
about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could be
a source of significant losses.


You worry about loss, when you receive good reports?

High voltage reveals loss in heat. Corona would be an example, but
you don't describe corona. You also don't describe heat.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the tuner
capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500
MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.


I think you have a sign problem. You are describing a short antenna
with inductive reactance (given the height and wavelength, very
improbable).

However, this might be the feedpoint impedance at the lower end of the
shunt - maybe, maybe not.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing through
the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get
should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect
some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current.


Only in the shunt wire. Only if you are using wirewrap wire. Measure
the RESISTANCE. Multiply by CURRENT squared. You get WATTs. How
many? That is your loss. Now, if you can measure the resistance of
your tower, stand very far back because it is about to fall over from
being rusted out.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes the
antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire with
a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc.


With this statement, it is obvious that you are not touching the
screwdriver to the "end" of the antenna (some 15-20 meters above your
head).

Current and voltage are not uniformly equal along the length of the
antenna. Your beam at the top acting as a top hat might yield some
uniformity, but that doesn't come from simple math analysis.

Instead, what you describe is a feedpoint impedance calculation.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause some
significant loss?


You are working very hard to find a problem that isn't there.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

dave September 10th 11 02:15 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Antonio Vernucci wrote:

For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly big
HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a
motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed
capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across the
3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the
band. The antenna works fine and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops at
the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to
about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could be
a source of significant losses.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the tuner
capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500
MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing through
the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get
should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect
some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes the
antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire with
a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc. I am
wondering whether such a high voltage could constitute, by itself, a source of
extra loss. Please note that the wire coming down from the tower is connected
directly to the vacuum capacitor terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I do
not see a place where power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage, other
than perhaps in the humid air (?).

I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on the tower,
but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to tune across the whole
3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause some
significant loss?

Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


You did not describe your RF ground.

Antonio Vernucci September 10th 11 07:13 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
I did not describe the RF ground because I consider it not relevant to my
question.

Anyway, the ground system is formed by 64 quarter-wave radials.

73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy

"dave" ha scritto nel messaggio
. ..
You did not describe your RF ground.




Antonio Vernucci wrote:

For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly
big
HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a
motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed
capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across
the
3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the
band. The antenna works fine and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops
at
the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to
about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could
be
a source of significant losses.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the
tuner
capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500
MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing
through
the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get
should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must
expect
some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes
the
antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire
with
a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc. I am
wondering whether such a high voltage could constitute, by itself, a source
of
extra loss. Please note that the wire coming down from the tower is connected
directly to the vacuum capacitor terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I
do
not see a place where power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage,
other
than perhaps in the humid air (?).

I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on the
tower,
but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to tune across the
whole
3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause
some
significant loss?

Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy




you September 12th 11 06:44 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
In article ,
"Antonio Vernucci" wrote:

I did not describe the RF ground because I consider it not relevant to my
question.

Anyway, the ground system is formed by 64 quarter-wave radials.

73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


Until the RF Ground is described, You can't make any definitive
decisions, about any kind of Marconi Antenna, no matter how it is feed.
This is common problem with many, less than educated, Hams, that try and
design Antennas Systems for HF. Most of the Losses in these designs are
in the RF Ground System, and not in the Radiators. Just Say'en....
YMMV...

Antonio Vernucci September 12th 11 06:59 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Until the RF Ground is described, You can't make any definitive
decisions, about any kind of Marconi Antenna, no matter how it is feed.
This is common problem with many, less than educated, Hams, that try and
design Antennas Systems for HF. Most of the Losses in these designs are
in the RF Ground System, and not in the Radiators. Just Say'en....
YMMV...


I am not interested in knowing the overall losses and making decisions on my
antenna . I am just interested to know whether someone has experience on the
effect of very high voltage on the antenna terminal. And for that very purpose
the ground system is not relevant.

No useful answer received so far.

The problem of this newsgroup is that people not knowing how to answer a
specific question, reply to other questions, just to write something.

73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


Richard Clark September 12th 11 07:33 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:59:50 +0200, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote:

No useful answer received so far.


Hi Antonio,

Then, it would appear, after your having discarded technical points
curiously you want to be validated for thinking your antenna is lossy.

It will be hard to do that without your evidence (back of the envelope
computation does not qualify) that is contrary to everyone's
experience.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Jim Lux September 12th 11 08:17 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On 9/9/2011 12:10 PM, Antonio Vernucci wrote:
For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a
fairly big HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower
base, has a motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a
(properly selected) fixed capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune
the variable capacitor across the 3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a
perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the band. The antenna works fine
and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that
develops at the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW
applied, growing to about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure
whether such high voltage could be a source of significant losses.


Generally, your losses are going to be IR losses. High voltage implies
low current, and low loss.

However, when you start talking kilovolts, you might have significant
loss from corona discharge.


To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of
the tuner capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna
impedance at 3.500 MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.


That's the feed point Z of the basic radiator? or of the whole
assembly, including the shunt feed wire/tube?


ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing
through the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure
one would get should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2
ohm. So, I must expect some more loss in the conductors due to the
fairly high current.


Yes, that seems reasonable, but what conductor is that 10 amps flowing
in? What is its AC resistance at 3 MHz?


ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance
causes the antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz.
Touching the wire with a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a
nice Tesla-like arc. I am wondering whether such a high voltage could
constitute, by itself, a source of extra loss. Please note that the wire
coming down from the tower is connected directly to the vacuum capacitor
terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I do not see a place where
power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage, other than perhaps
in the humid air (?).


Corona is definitely a source of loss. Humidity doesn't change corona
much, but does change leakage across insulators (i.e. the crackling one
hears under HV power lines on damp mornings).

However, is it a *significant* source of loss? How much stuff is at the
HV? What's the actual surface field? (Running a screwdriver near it
perturbs the field)



I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on the
tower, but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to tune
across the whole 3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two
capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could
cause some significant loss?


HV loss is hard to estimate. You could make your shunt wire a shunt
tube or rod and basically eliminate corona (A rule of thumb is that
10-15 kV/cm radius will have virtually no corona.. so for your 6kV, a
1cm diameter tube is in the right ballpark) Skin depth at 3.5 MHz in
Aluminum is .043mm, and the usual rule of thumb is to make the tubing
wall thickness 3-5 skin depths. 0.12-0.20 mm seems about right. Copper
could be thinner wall (skin depth is less)

I'd worry more about loss across dirty insulators.
And even more about IR losses.




Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy



Wimpie[_2_] September 13th 11 11:58 AM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
El 09-09-11 21:10, Antonio Vernucci escribió:
For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a
fairly big HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the
tower base, has a motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a
(properly selected) fixed capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely
tune the variable capacitor across the 3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining
a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the band. The antenna works
fine and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that
develops at the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW
applied, growing to about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure
whether such high voltage could be a source of significant losses.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of
the tuner capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna
impedance at 3.500 MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current
flowing through the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A
figure one would get should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead
of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect some more loss in the conductors due to
the fairly high current.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance
causes the antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz.
Touching the wire with a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a
nice Tesla-like arc. I am wondering whether such a high voltage could
constitute, by itself, a source of extra loss. Please note that the
wire coming down from the tower is connected directly to the vacuum
capacitor terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I do not see a
place where power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage, other
than perhaps in the humid air (?).

I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on
the tower, but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to
tune across the whole 3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two
capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could
cause some significant loss?

Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


Hello Tony,

It is not the voltage that will introduce loss (as the field lines
will go into air and frequency is low), but it is (corona) discharge.
Whether this occurs, depends on presence of sharp edges and
especially sharp (double curved) surfaces with small radius, think of
bolts, threaded rods, etc that point away from the tower into the air.

A thin end of an antenne element can also cause breakdown as it points
far into the air (away from other solid structures) and the voltage
maximum will be at the elements of your HF antenna.

In case of your 8 kVrms (that is 12 kVp), an antenna element with
10mm diameter and spherical (smooth) end may result in 2.4kVp/mm at
the end. If the end of the element is just straight (just cut
aluminium), you will exceed 3kVp/mm and corona will occur.

If (corona) discharge occurs, you will notice a sudden change in VSWR
with increasing power.


--
Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
Please remove abc first in case of PM

Antonio Vernucci September 13th 11 04:06 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
HV loss is hard to estimate. You could make your shunt wire a shunt tube or
rod and basically eliminate corona (A rule of thumb is that 10-15 kV/cm radius
will have virtually no corona.. so for your 6kV, a 1cm diameter tube is in the
right ballpark) Skin depth at 3.5 MHz in Aluminum is .043mm, and the usual
rule of thumb is to make the tubing wall thickness 3-5 skin depths. 0.12-0.20
mm seems about right. Copper could be thinner wall (skin depth is less)


I presume that the corona effect should be visible at dark. So far I have seen
none, but we had not a single day of rain since I mounted this antenna
(incredible summer season...). So, I must verify when rain will come, in a few
days from now they say. Or do you think that corona may not be visible?

I am using a 4-mm diameter wire so, if I will really have corona problems, I
could insert the (vertical) wire into a 1-cm aluminum tube connected at the very
bottom of the wire (i.e. at the antenna feed point). Probably a 2-meter long
tube could be sufficient (RF voltage gradually diminishes getting away from the
antenna feed point).

73

Tony I0JX


Antonio Vernucci September 13th 11 04:30 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Hi Wim,

despite my wire is only 4mm in diameter, SWR does not vary at all applying a
steady full-power carrier (not even some small oscillations of the reflected
power meter needle). I then presume that no big corona effect takes place (also
because I see no corona light at dark). I am not sure whether a light corona
effect (i.e neither visible nor influencing SWR) could take place, but if so I
presume loss would anyway be very low.

I will check again under rain conditions (test not done so far), but I am not
sure whether rain increases susceptibility to corona, with respect to hot summer
days (with umidity close to 80% sometimes). Any idea at that regard?

73

Tony I0JX

Hello Tony,

It is not the voltage that will introduce loss (as the field lines will go
into air and frequency is low), but it is (corona) discharge. Whether this
occurs, depends on presence of sharp edges and especially sharp (double
curved) surfaces with small radius, think of bolts, threaded rods, etc that
point away from the tower into the air.

A thin end of an antenne element can also cause breakdown as it points far
into the air (away from other solid structures) and the voltage maximum will
be at the elements of your HF antenna.

In case of your 8 kVrms (that is 12 kVp), an antenna element with 10mm
diameter and spherical (smooth) end may result in 2.4kVp/mm at the end. If the
end of the element is just straight (just cut aluminium), you will exceed
3kVp/mm and corona will occur.

If (corona) discharge occurs, you will notice a sudden change in VSWR with
increasing power.


--
Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
Please remove abc first in case of PM



Jim Lux September 13th 11 04:40 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On 9/13/2011 8:06 AM, Antonio Vernucci wrote:
HV loss is hard to estimate. You could make your shunt wire a shunt
tube or rod and basically eliminate corona (A rule of thumb is that
10-15 kV/cm radius will have virtually no corona.. so for your 6kV, a
1cm diameter tube is in the right ballpark) Skin depth at 3.5 MHz in
Aluminum is .043mm, and the usual rule of thumb is to make the tubing
wall thickness 3-5 skin depths. 0.12-0.20 mm seems about right. Copper
could be thinner wall (skin depth is less)


I presume that the corona effect should be visible at dark. So far I
have seen none, but we had not a single day of rain since I mounted this
antenna (incredible summer season...). So, I must verify when rain will
come, in a few days from now they say. Or do you think that corona may
not be visible?



Nope.. you can't usually see the corona discharge. The professionals
use a special camera with a narrow band solar blind filter.




I am using a 4-mm diameter wire so, if I will really have corona
problems, I could insert the (vertical) wire into a 1-cm aluminum tube
connected at the very bottom of the wire (i.e. at the antenna feed
point). Probably a 2-meter long tube could be sufficient (RF voltage
gradually diminishes getting away from the antenna feed point).



Sure..

dave September 13th 11 05:08 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Antonio Vernucci wrote:

Hi Wim,

despite my wire is only 4mm in diameter, SWR does not vary at all applying a
steady full-power carrier (not even some small oscillations of the reflected
power meter needle). I then presume that no big corona effect takes place (also
because I see no corona light at dark). I am not sure whether a light corona
effect (i.e neither visible nor influencing SWR) could take place, but if so I
presume loss would anyway be very low.

I will check again under rain conditions (test not done so far), but I am not
sure whether rain increases susceptibility to corona, with respect to hot summer
days (with umidity close to 80% sometimes). Any idea at that regard?

What happens if you move the slant-wire up or down on the tower?

JIMMIE September 13th 11 05:46 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On Sep 9, 3:10*pm, "Antonio Vernucci" wrote:
For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly big
HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a
motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed
capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across the
3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the
band. The antenna works fine and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops at
the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to
about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could be
a source of significant losses.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the tuner
capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500
MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing through
the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get
should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect
some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes the
antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire with
a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc. I am
wondering whether such a high voltage could constitute, by itself, a source of
extra loss. Please note that the wire coming down from the tower is connected
directly to the vacuum capacitor terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I do
not see a place where power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage, other
than perhaps in the humid air (?).

I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on the tower,
but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to tune across the whole
3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause some
significant loss?

Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


I would think the losses as a result of 10 amperes current at the
feed point not to be excessive unless your shunt feed is made of small
wire. This is usually not the case if only designed for sound
mechanical integrity.

Jimmie

JIMMIE September 13th 11 05:51 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On Sep 9, 3:10*pm, "Antonio Vernucci" wrote:
For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly big
HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a
motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed
capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across the
3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the
band. The antenna works fine and I receive good reports.

The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops at
the antenna end (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to
about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could be
a source of significant losses.

To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the tuner
capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500
MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm.

ABOUT CURRENT
With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing through
the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get
should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect
some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current.

ABOUT VOLTAGE
The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes the
antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire with
a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc. I am
wondering whether such a high voltage could constitute, by itself, a source of
extra loss. Please note that the wire coming down from the tower is connected
directly to the vacuum capacitor terminal, with no stand-off insulator. So, I do
not see a place where power can get dissipated due to the high RFvoltage, other
than perhaps in the humid air (?).

I could probably avoid this situation by changing the tap height on the tower,
but I would run the risk of not being any longer able to tune across the whole
3500 - 3800 kHz band adjusting one of the two capacitors, and not both.

Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause some
significant loss?

Thanks and 73

Tony I0JX
Rome, Italy


Please forgive me but it seems a little odd that someone who can make
the calculations you have made can not compute the IR losses in the
feed. You are almost there.

Jimmie

Jimmie

Antonio Vernucci September 13th 11 06:53 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Hi Jimmie,

I am not sure of what you mean to say.

With regard to the IR loss (by the way, I presume that "IR" means I squared
times R), there is little difficulty to estimate them once you know the RF
current.

But my point was to estimate any extra losses caused by the very high voltage
that develops at the antenna terminal. I would not know how to estimate those.

73

Tony I0JX


Please forgive me but it seems a little odd that someone who can make
the calculations you have made can not compute the IR losses in the
feed. You are almost there.

Jimmie

Jimmie


Antonio Vernucci September 13th 11 06:55 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Nope.. you can't usually see the corona discharge. The professionals use a
special camera with a narrow band solar blind filter.


That is interesting.

But I presume that, increasing voltage, at a certain point the corona effect
becomes visible.

73

Tony I0JX


Wimpie[_2_] September 13th 11 07:32 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
El 13-09-11 17:30, Antonio Vernucci escribió:
Hi Wim,

despite my wire is only 4mm in diameter, SWR does not vary at all
applying a steady full-power carrier (not even some small oscillations
of the reflected power meter needle). I then presume that no big
corona effect takes place (also because I see no corona light at
dark). I am not sure whether a light corona effect (i.e neither
visible nor influencing SWR) could take place, but if so I presume
loss would anyway be very low.

I will check again under rain conditions (test not done so far), but I
am not sure whether rain increases susceptibility to corona, with
respect to hot summer days (with umidity close to 80% sometimes). Any
idea at that regard?

73

Tony I0JX

Hello Tony,

It is not the voltage that will introduce loss (as the field lines
will go into air and frequency is low), but it is (corona)
discharge. Whether this occurs, depends on presence of sharp edges
and especially sharp (double curved) surfaces with small radius,
think of bolts, threaded rods, etc that point away from the tower
into the air.

A thin end of an antenne element can also cause breakdown as it
points far into the air (away from other solid structures) and the
voltage maximum will be at the elements of your HF antenna.

In case of your 8 kVrms (that is 12 kVp), an antenna element with
10mm diameter and spherical (smooth) end may result in 2.4kVp/mm at
the end. If the end of the element is just straight (just cut
aluminium), you will exceed 3kVp/mm and corona will occur.

If (corona) discharge occurs, you will notice a sudden change in
VSWR with increasing power.


--
Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
Please remove abc first in case of PM



Hello Tony,

As long as your wire with D=4mm is not close to other structures (say
0.25...0.5m), you will not exceed 1 kVp/mm when the wire itself is
carrying 12kVp. You still have some margin before getting close to 3
kV/mm.

At ground level, influence of HF frequency on dielectric breakdown
voltage of air is negligible. If the wire is coated, the diameter
increases, hence reducing the E-field at the plastic-air interface.

When VSWR doesn't, change (with increasing power), the loss due to
corona discharge will be minimal. Of course when you lose 10W from
2kW, you will not notice this probably. However if you get a discharge
between metal and plastic insulation, the plastic will fail in the end
(due to spark erosion).

conducting Droplets (rain) do reduce the breakdown voltage as it
distorts the field. This introduces 'hot spots'. Unfortunately I don't
have data on this.

I could imagine that moisture/water layer on the wire would introduces
some loss (as you get a current through the moisture layer). But this
is not due to corona effect.

It can be calculated, as you know the voltage and you can calculate
the capacitance to ground (so you know the capacitive current that
"leaves" the wire.


--
Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
Please remove abc first in case of PM

Antonio Vernucci September 13th 11 08:30 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Hello Tony,

As long as your wire with D=4mm is not close to other structures (say
0.25...0.5m), you will not exceed 1 kVp/mm when the wire itself is carrying
12kVp. You still have some margin before getting close to 3 kV/mm.

At ground level, influence of HF frequency on dielectric breakdown voltage of
air is negligible. If the wire is coated, the diameter increases, hence
reducing the E-field at the plastic-air interface.

When VSWR doesn't, change (with increasing power), the loss due to corona
discharge will be minimal. Of course when you lose 10W from 2kW, you will not
notice this probably. However if you get a discharge between metal and plastic
insulation, the plastic will fail in the end (due to spark erosion).

conducting Droplets (rain) do reduce the breakdown voltage as it distorts the
field. This introduces 'hot spots'. Unfortunately I don't have data on this.

I could imagine that moisture/water layer on the wire would introduces some
loss (as you get a current through the moisture layer). But this is not due to
corona effect.

It can be calculated, as you know the voltage and you can calculate the
capacitance to ground (so you know the capacitive current that "leaves" the
wire.


--
Wim
PA3DJS


Thanks for info. When things go down to the physics level, it is not so easy to
understand phaenomena, unless one has specific knowledge on them.

73

Tony I0JX


Jim Lux September 15th 11 06:58 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
On 9/13/2011 10:55 AM, Antonio Vernucci wrote:
Nope.. you can't usually see the corona discharge. The professionals
use a special camera with a narrow band solar blind filter.


That is interesting.

But I presume that, increasing voltage, at a certain point the corona
effect becomes visible.


Yes.. but that's usually a LONG way from where there's detectable RFI or
noise for instance. When you can see visible corona from some meters
away, you're probably in the 10s or maybe low 100s of kV range.

For instance, I can run my small 14" Van deGraaff generator with no
visible corona in a semi-darkened room, but, judging from the copious
ozone production, there's quite a bit of corona (as well as the
characteristic crackle sound).

Maybe people have seen noticeable corona at 2-3kV, but that's usually
indoors in a dark room, and you're fairly close and well dark adapted.
Corona from aged ignition wires (around 15-20 kV) also often visible, in
the dark.






Antonio Vernucci September 15th 11 08:23 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
Yes.. but that's usually a LONG way from where there's detectable RFI or noise
for instance. When you can see visible corona from some meters away, you're
probably in the 10s or maybe low 100s of kV range.


My antenna voltage gets up to about 12 kV peak.

I will try listening at a short wave receiver placed very close to the antenna
and tuned to a vacant frequency slot. Increasing the transmitted carrier power,
at the power level at which the corona effect has instated, I should note an
abrupt received noise increase. .

73

Tony I0JX


Wimpie[_2_] September 15th 11 09:17 PM

Losses in shunt-fed towers
 
El 13-09-11 20:32, Wimpie escribió:
El 13-09-11 17:30, Antonio Vernucci escribió:
Hi Wim,

despite my wire is only 4mm in diameter, SWR does not vary at all
applying a steady full-power carrier (not even some small oscillations
of the reflected power meter needle). I then presume that no big
corona effect takes place (also because I see no corona light at
dark). I am not sure whether a light corona effect (i.e neither
visible nor influencing SWR) could take place, but if so I presume
loss would anyway be very low.

I will check again under rain conditions (test not done so far), but I
am not sure whether rain increases susceptibility to corona, with
respect to hot summer days (with umidity close to 80% sometimes). Any
idea at that regard?

73

Tony I0JX

Hello Tony,

It is not the voltage that will introduce loss (as the field lines
will go into air and frequency is low), but it is (corona)
discharge. Whether this occurs, depends on presence of sharp edges
and especially sharp (double curved) surfaces with small radius,
think of bolts, threaded rods, etc that point away from the tower
into the air.

A thin end of an antenne element can also cause breakdown as it
points far into the air (away from other solid structures) and the
voltage maximum will be at the elements of your HF antenna.

In case of your 8 kVrms (that is 12 kVp), an antenna element with
10mm diameter and spherical (smooth) end may result in 2.4kVp/mm at
the end. If the end of the element is just straight (just cut
aluminium), you will exceed 3kVp/mm and corona will occur.

If (corona) discharge occurs, you will notice a sudden change in
VSWR with increasing power.


--
Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
Please remove abc first in case of PM



Hello Tony,

As long as your wire with D=4mm is not close to other structures (say
0.25...0.5m), you will not exceed 1 kVp/mm when the wire itself is
carrying 12kVp. You still have some margin before getting close to 3
kV/mm.

At ground level, influence of HF frequency on dielectric breakdown
voltage of air is negligible. If the wire is coated, the diameter
increases, hence reducing the E-field at the plastic-air interface.

When VSWR doesn't, change (with increasing power), the loss due to
corona discharge will be minimal. Of course when you lose 10W from
2kW, you will not notice this probably. However if you get a discharge
between metal and plastic insulation, the plastic will fail in the end
(due to spark erosion).

conducting Droplets (rain) do reduce the breakdown voltage as it
distorts the field. This introduces 'hot spots'. Unfortunately I don't
have data on this.

I could imagine that moisture/water layer on the wire would introduces
some loss (as you get a current through the moisture layer). But this
is not due to corona effect.

It can be calculated, as you know the voltage and you can calculate
the capacitance to ground (so you know the capacitive current that
"leaves" the wire.



Short note on change in VSWR due to corona.

Many reflectometers use diode rectifiers with relative heavy load. If
there is no bias (or the bias is wrong), you will not notice small
variations in VSWR, when VSWR = (almost) 1.

If you have a directional coupler you may use your oscilloscope or
spectrum analyser as detector device. The oscilloscope (50 Ohms input
impedance) you can use to verify if the residual VSWR is because of
higher harmonics or real reflection. Of course the spectrum analyzer,
oscilloscope with FFT or a receiver (with heavy attenuation) will show
you the desired signal directly.

If you match to very low return signal, even a few Watts loss due to
corona you can detect at full power. you may need to do this during
very quiet weather as small mechanical changes due to elasticity of
the construction materials will lead to small changes in reflection
coefficient.

--
Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
Please remove abc first in case of PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com