Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
shorted 1/8 wave transmission line
Hello Group,
If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical 1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end? I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency. Tnx de KJ4UO |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The impedance would be +j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of inductive
reactance. If you open the far end, you'll see -j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of capacitive reactance, at the input. Roy Lewallen, W7EL PDRUNEN wrote: Hello Group, If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical 1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end? I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency. Tnx de KJ4UO |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Roy,
Many years ago an article was published showing nomographs for using 1/8 wave lines for universal impedance matching. Do you recall where and when that appeared, by any remote chance? I know you can do all this with computer programs now, but I can't easily carry a computer or software into many of the places I go. -- Crazy George W5VPQ Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... The impedance would be +j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of inductive reactance. If you open the far end, you'll see -j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of capacitive reactance, at the input. Roy Lewallen, W7EL PDRUNEN wrote: Hello Group, If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical 1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end? I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency. Tnx de KJ4UO |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Crazy George wrote:
... I can't easily carry a computer or software into many of the places I go. Everyone else does. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, I don't recall having seen that.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL Crazy George wrote: Roy, Many years ago an article was published showing nomographs for using 1/8 wave lines for universal impedance matching. Do you recall where and when that appeared, by any remote chance? I know you can do all this with computer programs now, but I can't easily carry a computer or software into many of the places I go. -- Crazy George W5VPQ Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Roy, see you're still at it! Just stopped by to say
hello; hope you're doing well. Regards, Jack WB3U On Tue, 11 May 2004 17:55:48 -0700, Roy Lewallen wrote: The impedance would be +j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
PDRUNEN wrote:
If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical 1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end? I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency. For lossless coax, it would be purely reactive, close to +jZ0. Questions like that are easy when one understands the Smith Chart. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
For lossless coax, it would be purely reactive, close to +jZ0. Questions
like that are easy when one understands the Smith Chart. -- 73, Cecil ============================== They are even easier WITHOUT the unessessary over-complication of the chart. A student's valuable time is much better spent learning about transmissiom lines instead of how to use an antique chart. The answer can be worked out in the head in less than a second. Tan(45) = 1.0000000 and therefore X = Zo. Sorry to hear about your pH problem. Isn't there an ant-acid preparation available in this modern day and age? ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Reg Edwards wrote:
They are even easier WITHOUT the unessessary over-complication of the chart. Why do you think the chart is "over-complicated". I have one with the R,X values and only the to/from wavelength circles outside. I deleted everything else from the Smith Chart program. What I find convenient is to carry the image of the Smith Chart around in my head. I'm more of a visual person than a formula person and that image has helped me tremendously. A student's valuable time is much better spent learning about transmissiom lines instead of how to use an antique chart. The answer can be worked out in the head in less than a second. Tan(45) = 1.0000000 and therefore X = Zo. How about 0.07 wavelength in your head? :-) I can glance at a Smith Chart faster than you can pick up a calculator. Sorry to hear about your pH problem. Isn't there an ant-acid preparation available in this modern day and age? Prilosec OTC works well. Then I can drink twice as much as usual [hic]. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"Isn`t there an ant-acid preparation avbailable in this day and age?" I read in "Spectrum" that J.C. Maxwell took bicarbonate of soda but died of stomach cancer, regardless. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |