Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 01:29 AM
PDRUNEN
 
Posts: n/a
Default shorted 1/8 wave transmission line

Hello Group,

If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical
1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end?

I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was
interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency.

Tnx de KJ4UO
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 01:55 AM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The impedance would be +j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of inductive
reactance. If you open the far end, you'll see -j50 ohms, that is, 50
ohms of capacitive reactance, at the input.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

PDRUNEN wrote:

Hello Group,

If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical
1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end?

I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was
interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency.

Tnx de KJ4UO

  #3   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 04:48 AM
Crazy George
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy,

Many years ago an article was published showing nomographs for using 1/8
wave lines for universal impedance matching. Do you recall where and when
that appeared, by any remote chance? I know you can do all this with
computer programs now, but I can't easily carry a computer or software into
many of the places I go.

--
Crazy George
W5VPQ
Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address

"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
The impedance would be +j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of inductive
reactance. If you open the far end, you'll see -j50 ohms, that is, 50
ohms of capacitive reactance, at the input.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

PDRUNEN wrote:

Hello Group,

If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the

electrical
1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end?

I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was
interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency.

Tnx de KJ4UO



  #4   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 04:54 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Crazy George wrote:
... I can't easily carry a computer or software into
many of the places I go.


Everyone else does.



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #5   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 05:56 AM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, I don't recall having seen that.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Crazy George wrote:

Roy,

Many years ago an article was published showing nomographs for using 1/8
wave lines for universal impedance matching. Do you recall where and when
that appeared, by any remote chance? I know you can do all this with
computer programs now, but I can't easily carry a computer or software into
many of the places I go.

--
Crazy George
W5VPQ
Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address



  #6   Report Post  
Old May 18th 04, 07:54 AM
JL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Roy, see you're still at it! Just stopped by to say
hello; hope you're doing well.

Regards,
Jack
WB3U


On Tue, 11 May 2004 17:55:48 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote:

The impedance would be +j50 ohms, that is, 50 ohms of

  #7   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 04:48 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PDRUNEN wrote:
If I have an RG-58 coax and it is shorted at the load end. At the electrical
1/8 wave lenght what would be the impedance seen at the other end?

I understand that a shorted 1/4 wave length reflects an open, but was
interested in what happens at the 1/8 wave frequency.


For lossless coax, it would be purely reactive, close to +jZ0. Questions
like that are easy when one understands the Smith Chart.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #8   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 07:37 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For lossless coax, it would be purely reactive, close to +jZ0. Questions
like that are easy when one understands the Smith Chart.
--
73, Cecil

==============================

They are even easier WITHOUT the unessessary over-complication of the chart.

A student's valuable time is much better spent learning about transmissiom
lines instead of how to use an antique chart. The answer can be worked out
in the head in less than a second. Tan(45) = 1.0000000 and therefore X =
Zo.

Sorry to hear about your pH problem. Isn't there an ant-acid preparation
available in this modern day and age?

----
Reg, G4FGQ


  #9   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 03:38 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
They are even easier WITHOUT the unessessary over-complication of the chart.


Why do you think the chart is "over-complicated". I have one with the
R,X values and only the to/from wavelength circles outside. I deleted
everything else from the Smith Chart program.

What I find convenient is to carry the image of the Smith Chart around
in my head. I'm more of a visual person than a formula person and that
image has helped me tremendously.

A student's valuable time is much better spent learning about transmissiom
lines instead of how to use an antique chart. The answer can be worked out
in the head in less than a second. Tan(45) = 1.0000000 and therefore X =
Zo.


How about 0.07 wavelength in your head? :-) I can glance at a Smith Chart
faster than you can pick up a calculator.

Sorry to hear about your pH problem. Isn't there an ant-acid preparation
available in this modern day and age?


Prilosec OTC works well. Then I can drink twice as much as usual [hic].
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #10   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 10:14 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"Isn`t there an ant-acid preparation avbailable in this day and age?"

I read in "Spectrum" that J.C. Maxwell took bicarbonate of soda but died
of stomach cancer, regardless.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Folded monopole dilemma The other John Smith Antenna 15 April 23rd 04 07:20 PM
Complex line Z0: A numerical example Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 September 13th 03 01:04 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017