LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old May 15th 04, 04:33 PM
Jack Painter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jack Twilley" wrote

So who actually has the space and resources to set up an ideal
horizontal dipole on HF with the full length and height as specified
in all the formulas? Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to set up a
vertical if you could install something that high off the ground?


I thought a 1/2 wave dipole was "the standard". Standard meaning the
traditional use of the dipole for efficiency and common use. I did not know
it was a significant compromise from a full wave length long antenna which
would be impossible to install in most backyards when you talk about 60
meters or higher. If a full wave length dipole is common I never see
references to it either.

Jack Painter
Virginia Beach VA


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet Dick Antenna 2 February 6th 04 08:55 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) PA3HHO Antenna 2 September 1st 03 07:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017