Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jack Twilley" wrote
So who actually has the space and resources to set up an ideal horizontal dipole on HF with the full length and height as specified in all the formulas? Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to set up a vertical if you could install something that high off the ground? I thought a 1/2 wave dipole was "the standard". Standard meaning the traditional use of the dipole for efficiency and common use. I did not know it was a significant compromise from a full wave length long antenna which would be impossible to install in most backyards when you talk about 60 meters or higher. If a full wave length dipole is common I never see references to it either. Jack Painter Virginia Beach VA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) | Antenna |