Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it considered bad design to support the bi-quad element on some kind of
stand-offs in 4 locations (2 per quad) between the element and the reflector? Like nylon, possibly using a dab of epoxy to hold them in place? In principle this ought to be OK. The presence of the standoff will have some effect on the antenna's electrical behavior (increased capacitance between element and the reflector) but I suspect that this would probably be negligible in most cases. Depending on the frequency in question, you might want to select a standoff material which is known not to absorb RF at those frequencies. If you're really feeling energetic, don't use nylon and epoxy - fabricate standoffs out of Teflon, with a hole-and-slit arrangement to admit and hold the antenna element, and a tapped hole in the base to allow it to be secured to the reflector plate with a nonmetallic screw. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |