Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
There are both wave descriptions of this process, and lumped circuit equivalents. Both work, and both describe the same process from different points of view. One does not negate the other's validity I agree with that last statement - and we can take it a step further. Each description can do things that the other one can't; no argument about that. But in cases where both descriptions should be valid, then they *must* agree. This is a basic cross-check that should always be applied... but regrettably isn't. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |