Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
We both know that momentum and energy must be conserved. We just disagree agree on how nature chooses to do that. Well then, please enlighten us, Jim. How does nature choose to reverse the momentum in the wave reflected from a mismatched source? It is obvious that the wave reflected from a mismatched source has momentum in the rearward direction. Exactly what reverses that momentum? Please be specific. Remember that standing waves prove that the rearward-traveling wave exists in reality and thus possesses energy and momentum in the rearward direction, both of which must be conserved. Maybe you should read _Microwave_Transmission_ by J. C. Slater before you continue? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |