Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Kolesnik wrote:
I know that any power not dissipated by an antenna is reflected back to the transmitter. Then the transmitter "reflects" this reflection back to antenna, ad nauseum until its all gone. I also know that a short or an open is required to reflect power and I'm searching for which it is, an open or a short. I'm inclined to think it's a virtual open but I'm at a loss to understand that and I wonder if someone has a good explanation or analogy and some math wouldn't hurt. tnx Hank WD5JFR Hi Hank, Here's a link which talks about (and illustrates) the physics of waves at a boundary. http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/waves/U10L3a.html It shows what happens at the two extremes for transverse waves along a string - not unlike electromagnetic waves in a transmission line in some ways. In one instance, the string is fastened directly to the boundary - a rod in this case. This is analogous to a short across a transmission line. It will be seen that a reflection occurs, and that the wave becomes inverted upon reflecting. In the other case, the string is fastened to a ring which can slide freely up and down the rod. This case is analogous to an unterminated, or open transmission line. It can be seen that this too causes a reflection, only this time the wave is reflected back without a phase reversal. The amplitude of the reflected wave in both these cases equals the amplitude of the incident wave. Now imagine that some friction between the sliding ring and the rod can be added in varying amounts. This friction would be proportional to the conductance in an electrical circuit, and would be infinite at one extreme and zero at the other. The greater the friction, the greater the conductance (and the lower the electrical resistance). As we begin to increase the friction (conductance) from zero, the amplitude of the inverted, reflected wave begins to decrease. The decrease in amplitude continues with increasing friction until the amplitude of the reflected wave becomes zero. It could be said that this value is equal to the Z0 of the transmission line. As the amount of friction is increased still further, a small reflection once again begins to appear. Only now the phase is opposite from what it was before. Further increases in friction produce further increases in reflection amplitude until the amplitude of the reflected wave once again equals the amplitude of the incident wave. What we noticed in the exercise is that there is some value of friction (conductance or resistance) for which no reflection occurs. The exact value depends on the medium through which the wave is propagating. All other values produced a reflection. There is no perfect explanation, and this certainly isn't a perfect analogy but I hope that it will at least help give you a little more of a feel for the idea. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |