Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
The definition is accurate as well as descriptive. As I've explained at least a dozen times, energy only moves in the direction of transfer. Energy moves in whatever direction energy moves. According to you, if we reflect light energy from Alpha Centauri back to Alpha Centauri, no energy movement has occurred. Never mind that it takes 20 years to accomplish that energy movement. Your "no work equals no energy" concept is as bogus as it possibly can be. Joules of energy passing a point in delta- time is power, by IEEE definition. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |