LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old May 25th 04, 02:34 PM
'Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dave,
Depending on if the 'old' vertical covered 40 meters at
all, the 'new' vertical might be an improvement. But not
really 'much' of one, there may be no practical difference
in performance on 40 meters.
Would 15 meters be a bonus? If you mean an unexpected
improvement over the 'old' vertical, then, no, the 'old'
vertical probably would work better on 15 meters.
If you don't have the "bunch of in-ground radials" already
in the ground, put them in and then put the 'old' vertical over
them! I think you'll see a greater over-all improvement that
way, rather than with just the 'new' vertical (except on
40 meters, maybe).
"Full sized" antennas work 'better' than 'shortened'
antennas,
in general, but sometimes that 'better' is sort'a hard to hear.
'Doc
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Question on antenna symantics Jimmy Antenna 28 January 27th 04 01:10 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017