Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave, Depending on if the 'old' vertical covered 40 meters at all, the 'new' vertical might be an improvement. But not really 'much' of one, there may be no practical difference in performance on 40 meters. Would 15 meters be a bonus? If you mean an unexpected improvement over the 'old' vertical, then, no, the 'old' vertical probably would work better on 15 meters. If you don't have the "bunch of in-ground radials" already in the ground, put them in and then put the 'old' vertical over them! I think you'll see a greater over-all improvement that way, rather than with just the 'new' vertical (except on 40 meters, maybe). "Full sized" antennas work 'better' than 'shortened' antennas, in general, but sometimes that 'better' is sort'a hard to hear. 'Doc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |