"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
If you don't believe that photons can cause heating, go stand in
front of an active radar dish.

There are the "oscilltory flow of electrons".
S*

No. The same effect occurs when you put the dish in vacuum.

In vacuum is rare plasma (ions and electrons). Plasma is a conductor.
The electrons are free to move.
S*

If the propagation of electromagnetic waves would be dependent on
residual electrons present in the imperfect vacuum (like in space),
there would be a tendency for propagation to become worse when the vacuum
would be more and more perfect. There is no such effect ever observed.

Up to now we see distant stars. The plasma is produced by stars. So we are
not in perfect vacuum.
My be that such is behind the last star.
S*

"Jeff" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On 21/04/2012 07:57, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Apr 20, 10:59 am, "Szczepan wrote:
(re radar) There are the "oscilltory flow of electrons".

Sorry about your theory but radar signals travel at the speed of
light, a feat that is impossible for electrons.

Wind is like the electron beam. They travel with the "wind' speed.
The sound and electron waves like the oscillating species (electrons or
molecules). They travel with the wave speed.
S*

So you are saying that Einstein was wrong when he stated that "E=mc2"?

It has been demonstrated that electrons have mass, but for them to travel
at the speed of light as radio signals do that mass would be infinite!!

The air molecules travel with the speed of the wind. But they oscillate if
there is the sound source.
The speed of sound and the speed the wind are the different things.

The same is with the electron waves speed and the electron beam speed.

Are you cleverer than Einstein??

Einstein is not one of the radio fathers.
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Up to now we see distant stars. The plasma is produced by stars. So we are
not in perfect vacuum.
My be that such is behind the last star.
S*

This is meaningless, babbling gibberish.

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Einstein is not one of the radio fathers.

Einstein is the person most responsible for proving that a lot of what the
"radio fathers" wrote is wrong.

In message ,
writes
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Einstein is not one of the radio fathers.

Einstein is the person most responsible for proving that a lot of what the
"radio fathers" wrote is wrong.

And I expect he did it without even building a crystal set!
--
Ian

On 4/21/2012 1:51 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisal w wiadomosci

So you are saying that modulation can't work?

Continuous waves are opposite to damped waves.

How can radio waves be wet?

tom
K0TAR

"tom" napisal w wiadomosci
. net...
On 4/21/2012 1:51 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisal w wiadomosci

So you are saying that modulation can't work?

Continuous waves are opposite to damped waves.

How can radio waves be wet?

I do not know: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ondes_amorties.jpg
S*

On 4/22/2012 3:50 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisal w wiadomosci
. net...
On 4/21/2012 1:51 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisal w wiadomosci

So you are saying that modulation can't work?

Continuous waves are opposite to damped waves.

How can radio waves be wet?

I do not know: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ondes_amorties.jpg
S*



What a maroon.

tom
K0TAR

Jeff wrote:
S*



What a maroon.


Dopes this mean he should be launched into the air and then explode with
a loud bang??

Jeff

What do you mean "Dopes"?

Jeff wrote:
On 23/04/2012 08:40, Rob wrote:
wrote:
S*



What a maroon.


Dopes this mean he should be launched into the air and then explode with
a loud bang??

Jeff

What do you mean "Dopes"?

I mean " does", it's just my fingers (or spell checker) that are dopes


Jeff

You see that you can make spelling errors yourself.
Maybe you should consider that when making fun of other people's
spelling errors.