"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...


napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

napisa? w wiadomo?ci
...

Tesla was playing with Tesla coils and extremely high voltages which
produced RF energy as a by product.

What was the main product?

High voltages, idiot.

# Voltage is not product. The splendid, long sparks are.
# What the sparks are made of?
# S*

PLONK ..._._

"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...
# Voltage is not product. The splendid, long sparks are.
# What the sparks are made of?
# S*

Good evening Szczepan.

Your question "What the sparks are made of?" was answered in the posting
from jimp @ specsol.spam.sux.com dated 15 April 2012 17:06.

Are you having difficulty reading or understanding the emails send by others
and intended to enlighten and inform you and answer your search for
understanding?

Have you looked at any of the books I mentioned in an earlier posting,
please?

Kindest regards, Ian.

"Ian" napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...
# Voltage is not product. The splendid, long sparks are.
# What the sparks are made of?
# S*

Good evening Szczepan.

Your question "What the sparks are made of?" was answered in the posting
from jimp @ specsol.spam.sux.com dated 15 April 2012 17:06.

Are you having difficulty reading or understanding the emails send by
others and intended to enlighten and inform you and answer your search for
understanding?

In all answers no clear information if your "black box" have the
earth/chassis/counterpoise.

Have you looked at any of the books I mentioned in an earlier posting,
please?

I know what is in the books. I do not know if your ""black box" have the
earth/chassis/counterpoise."
Best Regards,
S*

"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
.. .

In all answers no clear information if your "black box" have the
earth/chassis/counterpoise.

Have you looked at any of the books I mentioned in an earlier posting,
please?

I know what is in the books. I do not know if your ""black box" have the
earth/chassis/counterpoise."
Best Regards,
S*

Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.

On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

tom
K0TAR

tom wrote:

snip

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He has been doing it for many years now.

He does not misunderstand English.

With all his years of posting, one would have expected his English to
have improved over the years; it hasn't.

That alone should be an indicator.

In message , tom
writes
On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

I think he's the same guy who, for several years, has been posting
similar nonsense in various newsgroups. The script is usually similar,
typically "I have only a very basic knowledge of physics, but I know
that Einstein was completely wrong about his theory of relativity".
--
Ian

Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , tom
writes
On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

I think he's the same guy who, for several years, has been posting
similar nonsense in various newsgroups. The script is usually similar,
typically "I have only a very basic knowledge of physics, but I know
that Einstein was completely wrong about his theory of relativity".

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

Uzytkownik "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

I read that now:

""A further feature of the structure of negative coronas is that as the
electrons drift outwards, they encounter neutral molecules and,
withelectronegative molecules (such as oxygen and water vapor), combine to
produce negative ions. These negative ions are then attracted to the
positive uncurved electrode, completing the 'circuit'.". From: Negative
coronas. Mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_...gative_coronas

""The difference, then, between positive and negative coronas, in the matter
of the generation of secondary electron avalanches, is that in a positive
corona they are generated by the gas surrounding the plasma region, the new
secondary electrons travelling inward, whereas in a negative corona they are
generated by the curved electrode itself, the new secondary electrons
travelling outward."

"in a negative corona the electrons are generated by the curved electrode
itself".

Is the field electron emission from the tip top of antenna or not?

Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

So it does not apply to amateur radio antennas.