Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Also, if your electrons are leaving the antenna, and flying off into the ether, there should be a rather large positive charge left on the antenna. If you then claim that the transmitter is replacing the electrons as fast as they are radiated, then the positive charge should reside in the transmitter. If you then claim that the local electric utility is supplying electrons to the transmitter, then the utility generating station must have a huge positive charge. Well, he thinks that this is what is happening and therefore he believes that any transmitter should always be grounded so that the earth can supply the missing electrons and prevent the transmitter from being charged more and more. However, we all know this doesn't happen. He himself has no way to verify it because he does not have a transmitter (or he is not bright enough to realize that maybe he has one in his pocket). So he keeps insisting that the transmitter must be grounded or problems would occur because of the electron emission. When everyone agrees that these problems do not occur, he does not realize that maybe the electron emission is not there at the voltages involved, and he was wrong after all. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carbon Emission Regulations to be Used as Censorship Tool | Shortwave |