Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:18:29 -0400, John Ferrell wrote: I put up a fan inverted -V cut for 80-40-30 a while back just to test. I use a tuner, as long as the transmitter likes it, I like it. If it's anywhere near a 1/2 wave dipole, a fan dipole shouldn't need a tuner. I've built two fan dipoles over the years. Since everything affects everything else, I spent far too much time adjusting the wire lengths. I eventually settled on a trapped dipole, which was easier and worked the first time. Either antenna would work for me except for the length. I don't have the room for a proper 80 meter dipole. For the immediate problem, I'll be happy if I can get on 20 meters (PSK31) and 10 meters (radio club net). FYI I spent an afternoon with EZNEC exploring fan dipoles. What I found was the farther apart the wires, the less the interaction, which is what one would expect from common sense. From my limited runs it appears that somewhere around 20 degrees is about where the minimum separation needs to be for practical length adjustments. At angles less than that be prepared to spend a lot of time pruning. It doesn't matter if the wires are separated vertically or horizontally other than horizontal separatation means you need lots of support points. If the bands are too close together, i.e. 20-17, 17-15, 12-10, you can never get both bands to "work", i.e. a decent match. That appears to be also true for trap antennas from some limited EZNEC modeling. Of course, there is always the alternative of throwing technology and money at the problem and just put up whatever wire you can and put an autotuner up. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PING Smokin Billy Goat Gruff | Shortwave | |||
Smokin Billy...Smoke This! | Shortwave | |||
Dave Smokin` de Ganja Mon | Shortwave | |||
Smokin' Jukebox On AMMR | Broadcasting | |||
Smokin Jukebox on AMMR | Shortwave |