Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2012 3:22 PM, W5DXP wrote:
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:36:23 AM UTC-5, John S wrote: An antenna for which there is a sharp peak in the power radiated or intercepted by the antenna at a certain frequency, This is not correct. At 14.32 MHz a certain dipole accepts 159.2w from a 100v source into a resonant 62.8 ohm feedpoint impedance. At 14.25 MHz, it accepts 160.2w from a 100v source into a non-resonant 61.9-j6 ohm feedpoint impedance. So it appears that you are technically correct but maybe splitting hairs. ![]() -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com You used a fixed 100V source. If you can do that, I can use a fixed 1A source. In that case a resonant antenna of 62.8 ohms feedpoint resistance will radiate very nearly 62.8W. An antenna with a feedpoint impedance of 62.8 + j50 will radiate very near 62.8W. There is no sharp peak in the power radiated whether at resonance or not. The definition as it stands is incorrect. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CB "Swing"? (proper AM modulation) | Homebrew | |||
What is the proper environment for a ham shack? | Moderated | |||
the proper way to write a qsl report? | Shortwave | |||
the proper way to qsl? | Shortwave | |||
proper antenna installation | Antenna |